Allowed

Jagdish S/O Parthilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 May 2023CRLMB/2541/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, allowed S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2541/2023. The court granted coercive bail to the petitioner fleeing the country due to illness and medical treatment, citing Article XV of the Indian Constitution.

What did the court decide?

Coercive bail granted to the petitioner who is confined in the district jail and unable to appear due to illness and medical treatment.

Jagdish S/O Parthilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/011254]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

2541/2023

¶5

Jagdish S/o Parthilal, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Sakatpur Police Station Dug District Jhalawar (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶12

18/05/2023

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk ihMkok] >kykokM esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 253@22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 366] 376]¼2½¼,u½ Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls jaft'ko'k feF;k :i ls bl izdj.k esa vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSaA mudk fodYi esa ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd ekeyk vf/kdre vkilh lgefr dk gS] ihfMrk us vius /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa esa tcju laca/k cukus dk dksbZ vkjksi ugha yxk;k gS ,oa ifr iRuh ds :i esa

[2023/RJJP/011254]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-2541/2023]

lkFk jgus dk dFku fd;k gS] izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDRk fnukad 15-12-22 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶19

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶21

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr txnh'k iq= ijFkhyky dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mls vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosaA

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

Murari/46

Jagdish S/O Parthilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish S/O Parthilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manan Ojha S/O Yashvant Ojha Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Mahawar @ Vikki Son of Ramavtar Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Singh Son of Shri Kanhaiyalal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Son of Murli Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramesh Chand @ Bhimraj @ Bhoot Ji S/O Chouthmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aman Khan @ Immu S/O Abdul Salam Vs State of Rajasthan