Petitioner sought bail in an S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous application. Counsel requested to reserve the application pending a fresh filing after the seizure officer's statement is recorded. The Court accordingly dismissed the current application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[2023:RJ-JD:32844]
[CRLMB-2450/2023]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2450/2023
Ramesh Kumar S/o Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Dhani Rohi 3 Ntr Nethrana Police Station Gogamedi Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Bhadra)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Choudhary. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
05/10/2023
Learned counsel representing the petitioner does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage but, he craves leave of the Court to file a fresh bail application after the statement of the seizure officer is recorded.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty prayed for. It is expected from the trial court that the statement of the seizure officer will be recorded on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
21-Tikam/-
RAMESH KUMAR
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
KULDEEP MATHUR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
