In this bail application, the Court granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioners, leading to the quashing of the quashing petition filed by the State in the ongoing appeal.
Interim anticipatory bail granted to petitioners; quashing petition filed by State against them quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023/RJJP/008877]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2214/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. For : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Order
01/05/2023
izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k dks iqfyl Fkkuk vkcdkjh fujks/kd ny] ckanhdqbZ] ftyk nkSlk ij iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 40@2022&23 varxZr /kkjk 16@54] 54d] 54Mh vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e esa vfxze tekur fn;s tkus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ jgk fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gS] muds fo:) dfFkr vkjksi iw.kZr%
[2023/RJJP/008877]
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2214/2023]
feF;k gS] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,slh dksbZ lkexzh ugha vkbZ gS ftlls vfHk;qDrx.k dks vkjksfir vijk/k ls tksMk tk ldsA vfHk;qDrx.k ekSds ij cjkenxh ds le; ugha Fks] dksbZ vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gS] vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks muds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk] vfHk;qDrx.k ds vkijkf/kd fjdksMZ rFkk miyC/k lkexzh dks ns[krs gq, vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k /kkjk 16@54Mh vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e dk vkjksi gS ftlesa vf/kfu;e] 1950 dh /kkjk 49 ds vuqlkj vfxze tekur ds izko/kku vkd`"V ugha gksrs gSa] var esa vfxze tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
gLrxr ekeys esa ;g vkjksi gS fd vkcdkjh foHkkx ds vf/kdkfj;ksa dks eq[kfcj ls ;g lwpuk feyh Fkh fd ?kVukLFky ij voS/k 'kjkc fufeZr dh tkdj fodz; dh tk jgh gSA Hkheflag ds dCts'kqnk edku ij igqaps rks ogka cksysjks xkMh la[;k vkj-ts- 29Vh,&0113 esa voS/k udyh 'kjkc Hkkjh ek=k esa Hkjh gqbZ feyh] edku dh ryk'kh yh rks mlesa Hkh Hkkjh ek=k esa fLizV] udyh 'kjkc rFkk 3700 gkWyxzke cjken gq,A
vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g cpko fy;k x;k gS fd mijksDr edku /kkSyh nsoh us dSyk'k pan ls fdjk, ij ys j[kk gS rFkk ;g okgu Hkh vfHk;qDr }kjk fnukad 18-10-2022 dks gh
[2023/RJJP/008877] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2214/2023]
(3 of 3)
fodz; fd;k tk pqdk gSA ;g lc cpko vuqla/kku dk fo"k; gS] vfHk;qDrx.k dh ekSds ij mifLFkfr gksuk rFkk rRle; ogka ls Hkkx tkus dk rF; vk;k gSA Hkkjh ek=k esa udyh 'kjkc] fLizV o voS/k 'kjkc fufeZr djus vkfn dh lkexzh cjken gqbZ gSA ,sls xaHkhj ekeyksa esa xgu vuqla/kku vko';d gSA
izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] vijk/k dh izd`fr ,oa xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k ds bl izdze ij ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA
ifj.kker% vfHk;qDrx.k jes'k iq= jkegsr o Hkheflag iq= uguwjke dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 naM izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /105
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted on interim basis to petitioners facing trial.
Whether the proceedings in the appeal filed by the State are bona fide and require quashing.
Whether the privacy and security conditions of the videography house give grounds for bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramesh S/o Ramhet
Bhim Singh S/o Nahnuram
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
