Allowed

Manoj Kumar Son of Shri Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 May 2023CRLMB/2127/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge order granting anticipatory bail in an NDPS case pending under the PMLA and Section 438 CrPC. The court rejected the reliance on the petitioner's silence during interrogation, noting he is also facing another impugned order.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; notice to public prosecutor; case against petitioner considered to be one of a quid pro quo relationship.

Manoj Kumar Son of Shri Radheyshyam Vs State of Rajasthan — Money Laundering | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2127/2023

¶3

Manoj Kumar Son Of Shri Radheyshyam, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 15 Nagar Palika Road, Losal Choti, District Sikar (Raj.)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, P.P.

¶9

: Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Order

¶12

04/05/2023

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eukst dqekj dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 03-02-2023 ds fo:) vUrxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk mls iqfyl Fkkuk gjekM+k] t;iqj if'pe esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 576@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20 ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 ,DV esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA

¶15

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ jgk gS fd mls bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ls dHkh cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gS] cjkenxh vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ls gqbZ gS] ftudh lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij gh mls bl izdj.k esa fyIr fd;k tk jgk gSA og vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus dks rS;kj gSA vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko';drk ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkosA

¶16

blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ds }kjk vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd bl izdj.k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ls xkatk

¶17

[CRLMB-2127/2023]

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

cjken gqvk gS rFkk vuqla/kku ds nkSjku mDr xkatk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eukst dqekj }kjk tfj;s eksckby uacj 7976465457 ls ysuk crk;k x;k gS] vuqla/kku ds nkSjku dkWy&fMVsy Hkh izkIr dh xbZ gS] ftlds vuqlkj nksuksa ds e/; yxkrkj okrkZ dk mYys[k gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,d vU; ,u0Mh0ih0,l0 dk izdj.k Hkh yafcr gSA vr% vfxze tekur izkFkZuki= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA dslMk;jh dk ,oa miyC/k nLrkostkr dk voyksdu fd;kA dslMk;jh esa tks vuqla/kku ds nkSjku rF; vk, gSa] muds vk/kkj ij ;g izdV ugha gksrk gS fd bl izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks fdlh izdkj ls feF;k vkfyIr fd;k x;k gks rFkk ,slh dksbZ vkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ka fo|eku ugha gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk ldsA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs ,oa izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶21

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eukst dqekj iq= Jh jk/ks';ke dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 438 n0iz0la0 vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶22

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶23

MAHESH/161

Manoj Kumar Son of Shri Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar Son of Shri Radheyshyam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudha D/O Aarti @ Arvind Vs State of Rajasthan

Babusingh S/O Shri Kansingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jamil Khatat Son of Mohan Khatat Vs State of Rajasthan

Alanoor S/O Shri Deen Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Tulsiram S/O Laxman Vs State of Rajasthan

Samaydeen Son of Alisher Vs State of Rajasthan