Allowed

Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jan 2023CRLMB/203/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court of Rajasthan allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court, after hearing arguments from the petitioner's counsel and the Public Prosecutor, held it just and proper to release the accused on bail pending trial, imposing a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail in FIR No.199/2022 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 203/2023

¶3

Ramesh S/o Shri Jamna Lal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gurjar Mohalla, Guvardi, P.s. Mangrop, Dist. Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged At District Jail, Bhilwara)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Jaipal Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Mukesh Trivedi,PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶10

Order

¶11

06/01/2023

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.199/2022, Police Station Hamirgarh, District Bhilwara for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 34 and 307 of the IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similarly situated co-accused Hari Singh has already been granted bail by this Court and the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused. The petitioner is in judicial custody and trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-203/2023]

¶17

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

¶18

Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Ramesh S/o Shri Jamna Lal, shall be enlarged on bail in FIR No.199/2022, Police Station Hamirgarh, District Bhilwara provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶21

252-Rashi/-

Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Praveen Kumar @ Piniya Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Anup @ Anop @ Arun Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar @ Raju Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarif N Rasik Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan