Allowed

Mahaveer Saini S/O Ramphool Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Feb 2023CRLMB/201/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications for two accused persons implicated in a cheating case. The court held it just to release them on personal bond with sureties pending trial without passing an opinion on the merits of their innocence or guilt.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners released on bail providing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Mahaveer Saini S/O Ramphool Saini Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/002202]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

201/2023

¶5

Mahaveer Saini S/o Ramphool Saini, R/o House B- 221, Indragandhi Colony, Police Station Vigyan Nagar, Kota (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined At District Jail Kota)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 394/2023

¶12

Mamta Saini W/o Mahaveer Saini, R/o B-221 Indra Colony, Police Station Vigyan Nagar, Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Kota)

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶16

----Respondent

¶17

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit, Adv. & Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv.

¶18

For : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶20

09/02/2023

¶21

These bail applications have been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.261/2022 registered at Police Station

[2023/RJJP/002202]

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-201/2023]

Vigyan Nagar, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Section(s) 420 & 406 IPC.

¶26

Learned counsels for petitioners submit that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that accused-petitioners are in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶27

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

¶28

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶29

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Mahaveer Saini S/o Ramphool Saini & 2.Mamta Saini W/o Mahaveer

¶30

Saini shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that

¶31

[2023/RJJP/002202] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-201/2023]

¶32

Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶33

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶34

DANISH USMANI /47 & 48

Mahaveer Saini S/O Ramphool Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahaveer Saini S/O Ramphool Saini v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Som Son of Sunil Som Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Jaga Son of Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Suman W/O Nemichand Vs State of Rajasthan

Shohil S/O Abdul Rasheed Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumit Kumar Jhanjharia Son of Shri Vijay Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Achala S/O Gulab Vs State of Rajasthan