The High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the petitioner, who is remanded in jail since June 19, 2022, holding a prima facie case and lack of co-offenders as sufficient.
Bail to the petitioner was granted, conditional upon deposit of personal and surety bonds totaling 75,000 Rupees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1850/2023
Mukesh @ Gangaram S/o Raju Metar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Thanavad, Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar(Raj.) (Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chain Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Saini, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
03/07/2023
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eqds'k mQZ xaxkjke dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns”k fnukad 21-12-2022 ds fo:) ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk mn~;ksx uxj] dksVk 'kgj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 147@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 376] 366] 323] 506] 427 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd, tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd mls bl izdj.k esa >qwBk Qalk;k x;k gSA og fnukad 19-06-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA ihfM+rk o;Ld gSA fopkj.k ds nkSjku mlds c;ku ys[kc) fd, tk pqds gSaA mlds dFkuksa esa fojks/kkHkkl gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ jgk gS fd izfrijh{k.k ds nkSjku ihfM+rk us Li"V rkSj ij dFku fd;k gS fd vfHk;qDr ds }kjk mlds lkFk tcjnLrh ugha gqbZ gSA muds chp tks Hkh gqvk
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-1850/2023]
gS] ethZ ls gqvk gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZ] fordksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 19-06-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA ihfM+rk o;Ld gSA izdj.k esa vkjksi i= izLrqr gks pqdk gS rFkk fopkj.k ds nkSjku ihfM+rk dh lk{; ys[kc) dh xbZ gS] ihfM+rk dh fopkj.k ds nkSjku vkbZ lk{;] nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdksZa] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; ,oa vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn] izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkr+k gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼ v{kjs ipkl gtkj :i;s½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@& :i, ¼ v{kjs iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i,½ dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk”k; dh izLrqr dj ns fd og izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is”kh ij mifLFkr gksrk jgsxk rks izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr eqds'k mQZ xaxkjke iq= Jh jktw esgj dks ¼;fn og vU; fdlh izdj.k esa okafNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Mahesh/91
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh @ Gangaram S/o Raju Metar
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
