Dismissed

Rati Ram S/O Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Feb 2023CRLMB/18273/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order dismissing a bail application. The court notes the petitioner is a co-accused where the next accused is asked to formally charge him and give a statement. It observes that no material on record justifies his summons beyond the delay in charges. The pleas of absence and providing accommodation are found unsustainable.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed; no relief granted.

Rati Ram S/O Kana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18273/2022

¶3

Rati Ram S/o Kana Ram, R/o Sujanpura, Thana- Dooni, District Tonk, Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandagupt Chopra, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶10

Order

¶11

04/02/2023

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk nwuh ftyk Vksad esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 293@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 343] 341] 325] 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus gsrq ;g vkosnu is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

cgl lquh xbZA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; iwoZ ls py jgs tehu lEcU/kh jaft'k ds dkj.k izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks bl ekeys esa feF;k :i ls Qalk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ,d okgu pkyd gS rFkk ftu fnu ?kVuk dkfjr gksuk crk;k x;k gS] ml fnu og xqtjkr x;k gqvk Fkk vkSj ekSds ij ekStwn ugha FkkA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ dh vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN dh vko';drk ugha gS rFkk og vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus ds fy, rRij gSA vr% mldk vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tk;s vFkok vUos"k.kdrkZ dks funsZ'k fn;k tk;s fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vuqla/kku esa lg;ksx djus ds fy, mlds le{k mifLFkr gks rks og mls fxjQ~rkj ugha djsA

¶14

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us fojks/k fd;k ,oa dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 341] 323] 325] 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds

¶15

(2 of 3)

¶16

[CRLMB-18273/2022]

¶17

vUrxZr vfHk;ksx ntZ fd;k x;k gS rFkk lk{khx.k feJhyky] y{e.k o ekuflag us /kkjk 164 n.M izfd;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr fo}ku eftLVªsV ds le{k tks dFku fd, gSa] mlesa mUgksaus vfHk;qDr jfrjke ds }kjk feJhyky ds lkFk lfj;s ls ekjihV dj xaHkhj migfr;ka dkfjr djuk crk;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd i=koyh ij vkgr dk pksV izfrosnu Hkh miyC/k gS] ftleas mlds nksuksa gkFkksa ij vfLFkHkax gksuk ik;k gSA muds }kjk izdV fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jfrjke ds fo:) iwoZ esa Hkh nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gq, gSaA i{kdkjksa ds e/; iwoZ ls jaft'k gksus ds dze esa i=koyh ij dksbZ lk{; ,oa lkexzh ugha gS rFkk uk gh ,slh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dk oDr ?kVuk xqtjkr esa gksuk o ekSds ij mifLFkr ugha gksuk izdV gksrk gksA orZeku ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) vUos"k.k py jgk gS] vr% izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tk;sA

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;k ,oa dsl Mk;jh dk v/;;u fd;k x;kA

¶19

izdj.k ds laf{kIr rF;ksa ds vuqlkj fnuakd 8-11-2022 dks ifjoknh fd'kuyky us lEcfU/kr iqfyl Fkkuk ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dh fd ml fnu lqcg djhc 9 cts mlds ?kj ls 300 ehVj dh nwjh ij vke jkLrs ij mlds firk feJhyky ij vfHk;qDr }kjk /kkjnkj gFk;kj ls geyk fd;k o muds nksuksa gkFkksa dks rksM fn;k o ck;s iSj o 'kjhj ds vU; Hkkxksa ij Hkh pksVsa vkbZ gSA ftl ij ekeys esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ dh tkdj vuqla/kku vkjEHk fd;k x;kA

¶20

dsl Mk;jh ij miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj nkSjkus vuqla/kku lk{khx.k ds iqfyl c;ku fy, x;s o ifjoknh fd'kuyky] vkgr feJhyky o lk{khx.k y{e.k eh.kk o ekuflag ds /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFku ys[kc) djok;s x;s] ftlesa lk{khx.k us vfHk;qDr }kjk feJhyky ds lkFk ekjihV djuk o mlds migfr dkfjr djuk crk;k gSA blds vykok vkgr dk pksV izfrosnu Hkh izkIr fd;k x;k o vkgr feJhyky ds oDr ?kVuk igus gq, diMs Hkh tCr fd;s x;sA dsl Mk;jh ij vkgr dk pksV izfrosnu o ,Dljs fjiksVZ Hkh miyC/k gS] ftlls vkgr ds nksuksa gkFkksa ij vfLFkHkax gksuk ik;k x;k gSA

¶21

(3 of 3)

¶22

[CRLMB-18273/2022]

¶23

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk vkgr dk iwoZ vkijkf/kd fjdkMZ Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds vuqlkj mlds fo:) ,d izdj.k /kkjk 365] 384] 420] 323] 341 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk gS o ,d vU; izdj.k /kkjk 147] 149] 323] 325] 341] 435 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk gSA orZeku ekeys esa izdj.k esa vUos"k.k py jgk gS rFkk izdj.k esa iz;qDr gfFk;kj o eksVjlkbZfdy tCr djuk 'ks"k crk;k x;k gSA tgka rd i{kdkjksa ds e/; iwoZ ls jaft'k gksus lEcU/kh rdksZ dk iz'u gS] i=koyh ij ,slh dksbZ lk{; ;k lkexzh ugha gS] ftlls i{kdkjksa ds e/; iwoZ ls jaft'k gksuk ekuk tk ldsA blh izdkj ,slh Hkh dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gS] ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dk oDr ?kVuk xqtjkr esa gksuk o ekSds ij mifLFkr ugha gksuk izdV gksrk gksA bu leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, bl U;k;ky; ds fouez er esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA

¶24

ifj.kkeLo:i izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶25

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶26

Jitendra Singh Panwar/116

Rati Ram S/O Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rati Ram S/O Kana Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar @ Monu Son of Laxmanram Vs State of Rajasthan

Aashiq Ali S/O Sh. Imam Ud Din Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar S/O Late Ram Chander Vs State of Rajasthan

Shyam Singh S/O Chen Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangilal S/O Laxmanram Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhannu @ Chhagan S/O Narsingh Vs State of Rajasthan