The applicant sought liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording statements of investigation/seizure officers. The High Court dismissed the present application as not pressed but granted the requested liberty and directed the lower court to record said statements on priority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1804/2023 Prakash S/o Sri Kishna Ram Prajapat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kumhariyo Ki Dhaniya, Akhasar Karun, Panchodi Police Station, District Nagaur. (Lodged In Central Jail, Chittorgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through P.P.
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. B. RayBishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi,P.P. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
30/05/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the present bail application but he seeks liberty to file a fresh bail application after the statements of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer are recorded before the competent criminal court.
Accordingly, the present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
It is expected that learned court below will record the statements of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
21 -Ravi Kh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to file a fresh bail application after recording statements of investigation officers
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash S/o Sri Kishna Ram Prajapat
State of Rajasthan
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
