Asharam S/O Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged an order enforcing antecedent recording in bail applications. Court found allegations of inaction by District Sessions Judges. Dismissed petition as premature since no final disposal of the antecedent recording mechanism was yet rendered.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJP/009550]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1800/2023
Asharam S/o Ramesh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Banetha, Police Station Banetha, District Tonk Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk District Tonk)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Choudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Mr. Lekh Pal Singh Rathore, Adv. for Mr. Raghuraj Singh Rajawat, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order
05/05/2023
1. izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk cusBk ftyk Vksad esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&126@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 307] 34 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3@25 o 5@25 vkElZ ,DV esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the order enforcing antecedent details in bail applications requires implementation or is suspended due to lack of judicial follow-up.
Whether multiple interim orders directing antecedent recording can be quoted if no final disposal is made.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Asharam S/o Ramesh
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
Uma Shanker Vyas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/1800/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court