Allowed

Raju Singh @ Rajender v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Dec 2023CRLMB/1651/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Rajasthan allowed Section 439 Cr.P.C. bail application. The court granted bail noting the absence of eye witnesses, weakness of last seen theory witnesses, and lack of recovered evidence, deeming further incarceration unnecessary for a likely lengthy trial.

What did the court decide?

Accused enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Raju Singh @ Rajender Vs State of Rajasthan — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:42781]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1651/2023

¶4

Raju Singh @ Rajender S/o Khaman Singh, Aged About 43 Years, Khiwansar, Teh. Sardsarsahar, P.s. Bhaleri, Dist. Churu. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Hanumangarh).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. PankajKumar Gupta
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Kumar, PP
	Mr. Ram Chandra Bishnoi

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order

¶11

08/12/2023

¶12

The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are

¶13

tabulated herein below:

¶14

S.No.	Particulars of	the Case
1.	FIR Number	190/1999
2.	Concerned Police Station	Guluwala
3.	District	Hanumangarh
4.	Offences alleged in the FIR	302, 364, 392, of IPC	201 & 34
5.	Offences added,if any
6.	Date of passing of impugned order	18.01.2023

¶15

It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in

(2 of 3)

[2023:RJ-JD:42781]

[CRLMB-1651/2023]

the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

¶20

Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

¶21

I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and I have perused the material available on record and challan papers and the other evidence recorded during trial.

¶22

Admittedly, the eye witness on account of the witness is not available and the entire case of the prosecution basing upon the so called last seen theory for which two witnesses PW-3 Jagdish and PW-4 Om Prakash were produced, however, both have not supported the story as set out by the prosecution. Besides this nothing has been recovered from the present petitioner. In my considered opinion the further incarceration of the petitioner would not be required. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.

¶23

Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with

¶24

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-1651/2023]

¶25

[2023:RJ-JD:42781]

¶26

two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶28

10-Samvedana/-

Raju Singh @ Rajender v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Singh @ Rajender v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Tanwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivraj and Ors. Vs State

Hemant Vs State of Rajasthan

Girdhari Lal Purbia Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan