Allowed

Ravindra @ Buliya @ Arvind S/O Madan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 May 2023CRLMB/1501/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to two petitioners charged with Section 302, 341, and 323 IPC following the death of a co-accused. The court held that the death of the co-accused broke the shared conspiracy narrative, rendering the delay in prosecution unreasonable despite pending cross-examination.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to both petitioners; prosecution instructed to complete cross-examination of remaining accused within two days.

Ravindra @ Buliya @ Arvind S/O Madan Lal Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/010784]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 1501/2023

¶4

Ravindra @ Buliya @ Arvind S/o Madan Lal, R/o Bay, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ( Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶5

Ajay Puniya S/o Madanlal, R/o Bay, Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ( Presetnly Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP Respondent(s) Ms. Kanchan, SI & I.O. Police Station Navalgarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu, present

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

15/05/2023

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& uoyx< ftyk&>qa>quw esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&254 @22 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 341] 323 Hkk-na-la- esa is’k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa] mUgsa izdj.k esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k

[CRLMB-1501/2023]

[2023/RJJP/010784]

(2 of 3)

gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ foyfEcr gS rFkk iwoZorhZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 250@2022 ls cpus ds fy, feF;k vk/kkj ij ;g fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶20

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd vfHk;qDr johUnz mQZ cqfy;k] vt; iwfu;k rFkk jkefd'ku mQZ fd'kuyky }kjk ?kkrd gfFk;kjksa ls ys'k gksdj vkgr jkds'k ij tkuysok geyk fd;k ftlds dkj.k yEcs le; rd mls vLirky esa HkrhZ jguk iMk rFkk og c;ku nsus dh fLFkfr esa ugha jgkA lh-lh-Vh-oh- QqVst esa nksuksa vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ekjihV djrs gq, mifLFkfr ik;h x;h gS] vUr esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds laca/k esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶22

gLrxr ekeys esa orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vkjksi gS fd mUgksaus vU; lg&vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ?kkrd rFkk /kkjnkj gfFk;kjksa ds lkFk ekjihV dh ftlls vkgr ds 'kjhj ij ikap pksVsa vk;h ftlesa ls pkj pksVsa xaHkhj izd`fr dh gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gSaA iwoZ vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh lqJh dapu] ,l-vkbZmifLFkr vkbZ ftUgksaus dFku fd;k fd vfHk;qDr jkefd'ku mQZ fd'kuyky dh fxjQ~rkjh gks pqdh gS rFkk 'kh?kz gh vkjksi i= U;k;ky; esa izLrqr dj fn;k tkosxkA ,slh fLFkfr esa vkgr ds

¶23

[2023/RJJP/010784]

¶24

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-1501/2023]

¶25

c;ku gksus ls iwoZ vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶26

vr% izLrqr rdks a Z] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] muds fo:) yxk;s x;s vk{ksiksa dh xaHkhjrk vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij foospu fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶27

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶28

fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vfHk;qDr i{k }kjk bl vkns'k dh izfr U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;s tkus dh frFkh ls ;FkklaHko nks ekg esa ifjoknh ds c;ku izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij ys[kc) djus dk iz;kl djsaA

¶29

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶30

Mittal/30

Ravindra @ Buliya @ Arvind S/O Madan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra @ Buliya @ Arvind S/O Madan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunder Singh S/O Padam Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav S/O Shri Pappulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Asharam Son of Sardar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Kumar S/O Chhitar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal S/O Sitaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar S/O Durgashankar Vs State of Rajasthan