Birda Ram v. the State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a third bail application. Court noted no change in circumstances after second application rejection. Bail rejected.
Petitioner filed a third bail application. Court noted no change in circumstances after second application rejection. Bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:42792]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15001/2023
Birda Ram S/o Khema Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Khakholi, P.s. Maulasar, Dist. Nagaur (Raj.) (In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Didwana, Dist. Nagaur).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JS Choudhary, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Pradeep Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Javed Khan
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
08/12/2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
This is third bail application on behalf of the petitioner.
At the time of rejection of second bail application by this Court, the injured had already been examined before the trial court and now only witness Ramkaran has been examined as PW4. Counsel for the petitioner has utterly failed to point out any change in circumstances. Thus, this Court is not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
Hence, the third bail application is rejected at this stage.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
100-MS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted despite no change in circumstances after previous rejection?
Birda Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Ganpat Lal
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court