Allowed

Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Dec 2023CRLMB/14766/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of Bajrang Lal, alleged to be falsely implicated in a case involving contraband of small quantity. The court ordered his release upon furnishing personal bond and sureties, without examining case merits.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Bajrang Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:41897]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14766/2023

¶4

Bajrang Lal S/o Shri Raja Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kadsu, P.s. Panchu, At Present Gali No. 18, Rampura Basti, Bikaner, At Present Sunder Vihar Colony, Chakgarbi, P.s. Muktaprasad Nagar, Dist. Bikaner. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Abhishek Mehta
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Laxman Solanki,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

04/12/2023

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Bajrang lal S/o Raja Ram under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.190/2023 registered at Police Station Muktaprasad District Bikaner for the offence(s) under Section 8/15 of NDPS Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The contraband recovered is below commercial quantity. He further submits that he is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:41897]

[CRLMB-14766/2023]

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶22

104-Arti/-

Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajrang Lal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhanwar Singh Vs Surya Kunwar

Babulal Vs Dhanraj @ Dhannaram

Ghewar Ram and Ors. Vs Ramesh and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Sanadhaya Vs State of Rajasthan

Dilip Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan