Dinesh Kumar Son of Gangaram v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner. The bench held that since the petitioner had voluntarily executed a compromise deed, the allegations therein could not be cross-examined per Sections 161 and 164 CrPC, rendering the continuance of the case in first instance prima facie not deserving of relief.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed without granting anticipatory bail pending investigation as the primary allegation was deemed conclusively true via compromise.