Allowed

Puran Mal v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Nov 2023CRLMB/14202/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bangalore High Court allowed bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for a petitioner charged under the Rajasthan Excise Act. The court deemed it just and proper to enlarge him on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each for appearance on all dates.

Puran Mal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:37877]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14202/2023

¶4

Puran Mal S/o Mandrup, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Gyangarh, P.s. Kareda, Dist. Bhilwara. (At Present Lodged In District Jail Bhilwara)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Achala Ram
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Shrawan Kumar,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

04/11/2023

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Puran Mal S/o Mandrup under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.251/2023 registered at Police Station Kareda District Bhilwara for the offence(s) under Section 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case,

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:37877]

[CRLMB-14202/2023]

this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned lower court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

582-Arti/-

Puran Mal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puran Mal v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Ram @ Raju Vs State of Rajasthan

Virendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Guddi Vs State of Rajasthan

Balistar Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahipal Vs State of Rajasthan