Allowed

Ravindra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Nov 2023CRLMB/13437/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single judge allowed a bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar under Section 439 Cr.P.C, directing him to furnish a personal bond of one lac with two sureties of fifty thousand each before the lower court.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the lower court.

Ravindra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:37304]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13437/2023

¶4

Ravindra Kumar S/o Khemaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/oUcheriya, P.s. Makrana, Dist. Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan. Presently Confined At Sub-Jail, Parbatsar.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	GirrajPrasad
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	SS Rajpurohit,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

02/11/2023

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner Ravindra Kumar S/o Khemaram under Section 439 Cr.P.C against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No.0463/2023 registered at Police Station Makrana District Deedwana-Kuchaman for the offence(s) under Sections 19 and 54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He is behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, he deserves to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

¶16

Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case,

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:37304]

[CRLMB-13437/2023]

this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

176-Arti/-

Ravindra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reliance General Ins Company Limited Vs Mangi Lal and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Amit Arora Vs Lalita Devi

Govind Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sushil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Nanad Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan