Allowed

Rakesh Bhil S/O Chhotu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Oct 2023CRLMB/12494/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application, the Rajasthan High Court allowed bail to the accused petitioner confined in Central Jail Kota for offences under various IPC sections, directing release upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner Rakesh Bhil to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Rakesh Bhil S/O Chhotu Lal Vs State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:30159]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12494/2023

¶4

Rakesh Bhil S/o Chhotu Lal, R/o Opp. Tejaji Mandir, Bajrangpura, P.s. Kunhadi, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

Banwari Lal Meena S/o Badri Lal Meena, R/o Teerath, P.s. Taleda, District Bundi.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shamsuddin Ansari For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.K. Sheoran, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶12

Order

¶13

18/10/2023

¶14

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner against the impugned order dated 25.07.2023 passed by learned Court below for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B IPC in FIR No. 335/2023 registered at Police Station Kunhadi, District Kota.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The accused-petitioner has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He is behind the bars since 13.07.2023. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by co-ordinate bench(es) of this Court. The case is exclusively triable by the Court of Magistrate. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude and till then, his further

[2023:RJ-JP:30159]

[CRLMB-12494/2023]

(2 of 2)

incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose. He is ready and willing to furnish bail bonds for his release. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶22

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶23

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioner namely Rakesh Bhil S/o Chhotu Lal, shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶24

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶25

SAHIL SONI /101

Rakesh Bhil S/O Chhotu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Bhil S/O Chhotu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushree Shobha Daughter of Shri Babu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gunjan Sharma D/O Shri Vishnu Kumar Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Sooraj @ Baggya Harijan S/O Shri Vinod Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Vs State

Mamraj Meena S/O Shri Ramkishan Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Meena @ Sukha S/O Shri Gotiyaram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan