Petitioner in a bail application craved liberty to file a fresh application after the Investigating Officer's statement. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed but granted the liberty.
Application dismissed but liberty granted to file fresh application after recording of Investigating Officer's statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
[2023:RJ-JD:33493]
[CRLMB-10535/2023]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10535/2023
Chandra Shekhar S/o Late Sh. Ambar Lal @ Amba Lal, Aged About 64 Years, Caste Soni R/o Jadiyon-Ki-Ol Ghanta Ghar Udaipur Raj. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Shah. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
07/10/2023
Learned counsel representing the petitioner does not want to press the instant bail application at this stage but, he craves leave of the Court to file a fresh bail application after the statement of the Investigating Officer is recorded.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty prayed for. It is expected from the trial court that the statement of the Investigating Officer will be recorded on priority basis.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
204-Tikam/-
Chandra Shekhar S/o Late Sh. Ambar Lal @ Amba Lal
State Of Rajasthan
Kuldeep Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
