Allowed

Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Apr 2023CRLMB/1048/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uma Shanker Vyas allowed the bail application filed by Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner was released on bail to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Release of accused-petitioner on bail along with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023/RJJP/007179]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

1048/2023

¶5

Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi, Resident Of Ghadi Gajpura, Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Dushyant Jain, Adv., with Mr. Udit Sapra, Adv.
For	: Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh
Respondent(s)	Rathore, GA-cum-AAG, with Mr. Tayyab Ali, Adv. &
	Mr. Deepak Khandelwal, Adv., for complainant

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

19/04/2023

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.345/2022 registered at Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 341, 307, 325 & 34 IPC and under Section(s) 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that no injury is caused on the vital part of the body

[2023/RJJP/007179]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-1048/2023]

of the victim. He also submits that charge sheet has been filed. It is also submitted that the accusedpetitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Ramdas S/o Shri Rambharosi shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /39

Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramdas Son of Shri Rambharosi v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devesh Kumar Saini Son of Laxmanram Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Kumar Meena S/O Batoi Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Pavan Kumar S/O Rajkumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Tundaram S/O Ram Chandra Vs State of Rajasthan

Taisif @ Toshim Son of Kalam Vs State of Rajasthan

Vimla Bai Wife of Kamlesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan