An application filed for revival of a previous criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous because the Investigating Officer had already considered the submitted documents and lodged a final negative report. A liberty was granted to file a protest petition.
Liberty granted to file a protest petition if aggrieved by the investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.79/2023
In
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.63/2023
Hanuman Prasad Son Of Heera Ram, Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of Bhopatpura, Tehsil Ringus, District Sikar (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhenwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
30/05/2023
(2 of 2) [CRLMA-79/2023]
Officer has not considered the same and proposed final report negative. Counsel submits that the Investigating Officer be directed to make investigation upon the documents upon which he placed reliance.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
KuD/9
Hanuman Prasad Son Of Heera Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Superintendent Of Police, Sikar
SHO Police Station Ringus
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
