The Single Bench corrected a clerical error in a bail order. The court directed that '15 days' in the order dated 23.11.2023 be read as '40 days' for the petitioner's temporary release.
The petitioner was ordered to be released on temporary bail for 40 days, correcting the earlier mention of 15 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:41245]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 472/2023
Indraram @ Inderraj S/o Chitra Ram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Dangawas, Merta City P.s., Dist. Nagaur (Confined In Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Muktiyar Khan,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
29/11/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:41245]
[CRLMA-472/2023]
(2 of 2)
para 4 the word 15 days shall be read as 40 days and the petitioner shall be released on temporary bail for 40 days. 4. The application is allowed and this order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 23.11.2023.
(FARJAND ALI),J
C-2-Samvedana/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 23.11.2023 allowing temporary bail should be corrected to reflect a period of 40 days instead of 15 days.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indraram @ Inderraj
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
