Dismissed
Mangi Lal v. State
Rajasthan HCCRLMA/37/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed a criminal miscellaneous interlocutory application on the ground that it had become infructuous due to a subsequent event of law. No substantive proposition was laid down.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶2
S.B. Criminal Misc. Appli No. 37/2020
¶3
- Mangi Lal S/o Sh. Leeladhar, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Gurjar, Resident Of Jalchakki, Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand (Raj).
¶4
- Rohit Badola S/o Sh. Satyendra Badola, Aged About 41 Years, By Caste Oswal, R/o Rajnagar, District Rajsamand (Raj.).
¶5
----Petitioners
¶6
Versus
¶7
- State, Through P.p.
¶8
- Umashanker S/o Sh. Ranchhod Lal Paliwal, By Caste Brahmin, R/o Village Jawad, Kankroli, Tehsil And District Rajsamand, Presently R/o At 901, Nilrat Heights, 10Th Road, Tps, 3 Cutters No. 174/near Paliwal Diary, Navi Mumbai (Maharashtra).
¶9
----Respondents
¶10
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah Mr. Rahul Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP assisted by Mr. CP Marwan
¶11
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mangi Lal
- petitioner
Rohit Badola
- respondent
State
- respondent
Umashanker
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMA/37/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court