Vishnu Bansal v. Meghraj
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Rajasthan allowed a S.B. Crml Leave to Appeal where the trial court acquitted the respondent of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for cheque dishonour.
What did the court decide?
The application for leave to appeal was allowed; the memo of application shall be treated as an appeal.
What the court decided
[2023/RJJD/016991]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 80/2020
Vishnu Bansal S/o Sh. Sant Lal, Aged About 64 Years, Partner M/ s Vijay Singh Prithvi Raj, 21 Nai Dhanmandi, Sri Ganganagar.
----Appellant
Versus
Meghraj S/o Sh. Sohan Lal, By Caste Chotiya, R/o Village Doctor Farsewala, Near Padampur, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. G.R. Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaidev Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order
24/05/2023
- Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the petitioner, which upon presentation got dishonoured owing to insufficiency of funds in the account of the accused. Thereafter, a legal notice was issued to the accused respondent and a complaint was too filed as per the statutory provision. The learned trial Court took cognizance of the offence against the accused respondent. After a full fledged trial, the learned trial Court acquitted the accused respondent from the offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act. There seems reasonable grounds to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vishnu Bansal
- respondent
Meghraj
Coram
Farjand Ali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLLA/80/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court