The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur, expressed prima facie satisfaction with the petitioner's appeal against a cheque bouncing order and granted leave to appeal, ordering the application to be treated as an appeal for further proceedings.
Leave to appeal is granted; the application to prefer a second appeal shall be treated and registered as an appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 301/2019
Inderchand Jain S/o Lt. Sh. Chotmal Ji Jain, Aged About 54 Years, Proprietor M/s. Kartik Auto Mobiles, G 571-B, Marudhar Industrial Area, Second Phase, Basani, Road No. 8, Jodhpur.
----Appellant
Versus
Ram Niwas Jani S/o Sh. Javanaram, (In Past Name Motaram Then Correct Name Jawanaram), M/s. Mahadev Travels Ltd. Agency, Marfat Bhagirath Choudhary S/o Chunnilal Ji Un Wala, Manot Dal Mil Ke Peeche, Sarvoday Basti, Bikaner. Presently Bambu, Teh. Sujangarh, Dist. Churu.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Dr. AA Bhansali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Patel
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order
18/08/2023
(FARJAND ALI),J
31-Taruna/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to prefer a second appeal under section 372 CrPC against a cheque dishonour judgment should be granted.
Inderchand Jain
Ram Niwas Jani
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
