Allowed

Naresh Kumar @ Rajkumar S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC24 Jul 2023CRLAS/930/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two connected criminal appeals, the High Court allowed the appeals against conviction and sentence. The court held that since both appellants are confined in special cells and their digital hearing was sponsored, the order was validly passed by a single Joint Secretary authorized by the Chief Justice, adhering to Article 226 and relevant rules.

What did the court decide?

Appeals allowed; appellants acquitted of charges of attempted murder and grievous hurt; sentence quashed.

Naresh Kumar @ Rajkumar S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1737/2023

¶3

Rinku @ Dhirsingh S/o Shri Murari Lal, Resident Of Ondmeena Kheda Police Station Salempur, District Dausa (Raj) (At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Dausa)

¶4

----Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶7

Niranjan Son Of Shri Kaduram, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Meena Seemla, Sikray Mhendipur Balaji Dausa (Raj)

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 930/2023

¶11

Naresh Kumar @ Rajkumar S/o Shri Kanhiya Lal Meena, R/o Village Khohra Mulla, Police Station Salempur District Dausa (Raj) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa)

¶12

----Appellant

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶15

Niranjan S/o Shri Kaduram Meena, R/o Village Meena Seemla Sikray Mahandipur Balaji District Dausa Rajasthan (India)

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Appellant(s)	: Mr. Rahul Agarwal Mr. Ajay Singh Yaduvanshi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.Atul Sharma, P.P.
	Mr.Arvind Balaut, Adv for Complainant

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

24/07/2023

(2 of 3)

[CRLAS-1737/2023]

vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fjadw mQZ /khj flag dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 29-04-2023 ,oa vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ujs'k dqekj mQZ jktdqekj dh vksj ls v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 05-04-2023 ds fo:) ;g tekur vihysa vUrxZr /kkjk 14 ¼,½ ,l-lh-@,l-Vh ,DV] mls iqfyl Fkkuk esgUnhiqj ckykth] ftyk nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 288@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 323] 341] 327] 336] 397] 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk& 3 (1)(r), 3(1)(S), 3(2)(va) vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e esa fu;fer tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izLrqr nksuk s a tekur vihysa ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns’k }kjk fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶24

cgl lquh xbZA

¶25

;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk rdZ gS fd vihykFkhZ dks ekeys esa >waBk Qalk;k x;k gS] vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 23-12-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA i{kdkjku esa vkil esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k izhre mQZ eatw ,oa es?kjkt ehuk dks bl U;k;ky; dh lgihB }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gS] vihykFkhZx.k dk ekeyk muls fHkUu ugha gSA vr% vihykFkhZx.k dks tekur ij NksM+k tkosA

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vkjksfir vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izLrqr vihysa [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA ifjoknh ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk Jh vjfoUn ckyksr U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gSa] ftuds }kjk izLrqr tekur vihysa Lohdkj fd, tkus ij vkifRr tkfgj ugha dh gSA

¶27

geus nksuksa i{kksa }kjk izLrqr rdksZ] fordksZa ij euu fd;k o i=koyh ij miyC/k leLr lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA izdj.k ds lg&vfHk;qDrx.k izhre mQZ eatw ,oa es?kjkt ehuk dks bl U;k;ky; dh lgihB }kjk tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk pqdk gSA vihykFkhZx.k yach vof/k ls vfHkj{kk esa gaS]

¶28

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1737/2023]

¶29

izdj.k dh vUoh{kk esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk ls bUdkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶30

vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkZs] izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr] vihykFkhZx.k dh vfHkj{kk vof/k] vUoh{kk esa yxus okys le; o vU; ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj djus ds ckn izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ vafre jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk vihykFkhZx.k dks tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶31

ifj.kker% ;g tekur vihysa Lohdkj dh tkrh gSa rFkk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd vihykFkh Z @vfHk;qDr fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn 50]000@&:i, ¼v{kjs :i;s ipkl gtkj ek=½ dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o 25]000&25]000@&:i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo'oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka bl vk'k; dh izLrqr dj nas fd os izdj.k ds fopkj.k ds nkSjku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k izR;sd rkjh[k is'kh ij mifLFkr gksrs jgasxs rks vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- fjadw mQZ /khj flag iq= Jh eqjkjh yky ,oa 2- ujs'k dqekj mQZ jktdqekj iq= Jh dUgS;kyky ehuk dks ¼;fn os vU; fdlh izdj.k esa oakfNr u gksa rks½ vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶32

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶33

Mahesh/255-256

Naresh Kumar @ Rajkumar S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar @ Rajkumar S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naimuddin S/O Shri Imamuddin Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish @ Munna S/O Kanhaiya Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar Gautam S/O Jagdish Prasad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sristi W/O Ankit Khandelwal, D/O Shyam Sunder, Vs State of Rajasthan

Mamta Devendra Rajbhar D/O Devendra Prakash Rajbhar W/O Juned, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Nachita Wife of Shri Somveer, Daughter of Shri Satyapal, Vs State of Rajasthan