Allowed

Vishnu @ Pummi Son of Shri Ramsawroop v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 May 2023CRLAS/455/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram Uma Shanker Vyas, J. The High Court allowed an application to withdraw the First Information Report (FIR) citing the appellant's confession of guile in depositing false names and considering the victim's conduct, concluding that a cognizance order proceeding thereon would be unwarranted.

What did the court decide?

Application for withdrawal of FIR allowed; cognizance proceedings quashed; accused discharged.

Vishnu @ Pummi Son of Shri Ramsawroop Vs the State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2023/RJJP/010046]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 455/2023

¶4

Vishnu @ Pummi Son Of Shri Ramsawroop, Resident Of Madhuvan Vihar Colony, Bayana, Thana Bayana District Bharatpur Rajasthan

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p

¶8

Victim, R/o

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Indresh Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP Respondent(s) Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar, Adv.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Order

¶13

10/05/2023

¶14

vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] Hkjriqj }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk c;kuk ftyk Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &837@2021 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 17-01-23] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZ dk tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls ;g vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA

[CRLAS-923/2023]

[2023/RJJP/010046]

(2 of 3)

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk dFku gS fd vihykFkhZ funksZ"k gS] fopkj.k ds nkSjku ihfMrk us lg vfHk;qDr lat; dk ?kVuk esa 'kkfey gksus ls badkj fd;k gS] blfy, mlds dFkuksa dh fo'oluh;rk lekIr gks tkrh gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ o ihfMrk ds dFkuksa esa ijLij fojks/kkHkkl gS] vihykFkhZ dks vdkj.k fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k rks mlds fof/kd vf/kdkjksa dk guu gksxk] vr% vihykFkhZ dh tekur vihy Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶19

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh }kjk tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vihy [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA

¶21

gLrxr ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ij vuqlwfpr tkfr dh 32 o"khZ; ihfMrk ds lkFk lkewfgd cykRdkj fd;s tkus dk vkjksi gS] ihfMrk us vius /kkjk 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds c;kuksa esa mijksDr vkjksiksa dks nksgjk;k gS rFkk iqfyl us ekeyk izekf.kr ekurs gq, o vfHk;qDr ds Qjkj gksus ls /kkjk 299 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 18 ds vuqlkj vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ,sls ekeyksa esa ugha nh tk ldrhA

¶22

(3 of 3)

¶23

[2023/RJJP/010046] (3 of 3) [CRLAS-923/2023]

¶24

izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr O vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk vihykFkhZ dh ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% vihykFkhZ fo".kq mQZ iEeh iq= jkeLo:i dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Murari Lal Sharma /10

Vishnu @ Pummi Son of Shri Ramsawroop v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishnu @ Pummi Son of Shri Ramsawroop v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Kumar Atriya S/O Bharosilal Atriya Vs State of Rajasthan

Sonu Singh Alias Hamendra Singh Son of Shri Shankar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Kumar S/O Ghasiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagsingh @ Chinta Son of Aaram Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Gyarsiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Kumar S/O Bhairu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan