Allowed

Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Nov 2023CRLAS/1585/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a Special Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14-A of the SC/ST Act against a bail rejection order. Setting aside the trial court's decision, the Court granted bail to the appellant charged with murder and SC/ST offences, directing him to furnish a personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 plus two surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 03.05.2023 set aside and accused-appellant released on bail subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2023)

(1 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:37947]

[CRLAS-1585/2023]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1585/2023

¶6

Mangilal S/o Bheraram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Teli Mohalla, W.no. 44, Suratgarh, P.s. Suratgarh City, Dist. Sriganganagar. (Presently Lodged At Dist. Jail, Sriganganagar).

¶7

----Appellant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

Mohanlal S/o Likhama Ram, R/o W.No. 3, Suratgarh Dist. Sriganganagar.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP Mr. Praveen Karwa

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶14

Order

¶15

06/11/2023

¶16

The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST (POA) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.23/2020, Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Section 302 IPC and Section 3(2) (V) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act against the order dated 03.05.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Court, Sriganganagar, whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

¶17

Earlier the appellant filed an appeal for bail which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 16.11.2022 with liberty to file afresh after recording the statements of Sohanlal and Sanjay Kumar.

[2023:RJ-JD:37947]

[CRLAS-1585/2023]

(2 of 2)

Counsel for the appellant submits that this is a case of circumstantial evidence and only on the basis of suspicion, the present appellant has been implicated in this case. After arrest of the appellant, his jacket was recovered and sent for FSL. According to FSL report, blood was not detected on the jacket of the present appellant. Counsel submits that there is no incriminating evidence against the present appellant. The appellant is inside the jail since 31.01.2020 and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for respondent No.2 have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶23

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

¶24

Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 03.05.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Court, Sriganganagar is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Mangilal S/o Bheraram arrested in connection with FIR No.23/2020, Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶25

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

¶26

96-MS/-

Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sandeep Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahesh Borana Vs State

Ravi Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Gurmeet Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Vs State

Veer Singh Vs State of Rajasthan