marked as Ex.-D/6, got lodged against the deceased Neetu for the offences under Sections 302 and 309 of the IPC alleging inter alia that the deceased committed murder of the minor son after bolting the room from inside and whereafter, she made an attempt to end her life. That case was thoroughly investigated for committing murder of the child and making an attempt to commit suicide but, however, after the death of the lady and lapse of some time, the case was ended with negative final report with the conclusion that on 20.03.2013, the deceased Neetu Devi took the boy Aryan in a room bolted it from inside and whereafter, poured kerosene on herself and on the boy Aryan, as a necessary consequence of which, the boy Aryan died and the lady Neetu sustained serious burn injuries. She died during treatment, therefore, the proceeding of that case culminated with the final report for the reason of incidence of death of the accused lady Neetu. He, thus, submits that the ingredients essential to constitute an offence under Section 304-B of the IPC have not been established, therefore, the appellant deserves to be acquitted from the charges. It is apprised to this Court that after serving the entire sentence, the appellant has been released but he seeks removal of stigma of conviction.
