Dismissed

State v. Khayali

Rajasthan HC2 Jun 2023CRLA/478/1996

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal by State against acquittal for murder dismissed. High Court found prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond doubt due to delayed FIR, unreliable eyewitnesses, lack of medical evidence and poor investigation.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; trial court's acquittal upheld.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

[2023/RJJP/011830]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 478/1996

¶4

State of Rajasthan through P.P.

----Appellant

Versus

Khayali Rajesh Leela

Surendra ( since died )

¶9

All Accused-respondents are S/o Girdhari Lal, R/o Bhoomore Teh. Alwar

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Appellant(s)	: Mr.	javed Chaudhary,Add. G.A.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Rakesh Bhargava, Adv.
	Ms.	VijayLaxmi,Adv.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Judgment

State Vs Khayali — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶20

dh fd fnukad 28-01-1994 dks le; djhc 6-30 ih-,e- ij og ,oa jkeizlkn eh.kk iq= f’ko yky eh.kk vius ?kj ls dVh ?kkVh dh rjQ vk jgs Fks rks lqjKkuh dh I;kÅ ds ikl yhykjke] [;kyhjke] lqjsUnz] jkts’k ,oa jkeizlkn iq= ukuxjke lHkh xksdqyjke ds lkFk gkWdh o ykfB;ksa ls ekjihV dj jgs Fks] yhykjke ds gkFk esa yksgs ds rkjksa o iksyk ls eM+h gqbZ ykBh Fkh] [;kyhjke ds gkFk esa lknk ckl dh ykBh Fkh ,oa lqjsUnz o jkts’k ds gkFk esa Hkh ykfB;ka Fkh rFkk jkeizlkn ds gkFk esa gkWdh Fkh] ;s lHkh yksx gkWdh o ykfB;ksa ls ekjihV dj jgs Fks rFkk xksdqyjke ds flj ij ,oa gkFk ij ckj&ckj pksVsa ekjh rks xksdqyjke tehu ij fx;k x;k rFkk fxjs gq, ds Hkh bu ikapksa O;fDr;ksa us gkWdh o ykfB;ksa ls dkQh pksVsa ekjh] mlus rFkk jkeizlkn rFkk mlds firkth y{e.k izlkn ,oa mldh ekWa HkkSajh nsoh us ekSds ij igqap dj xksdqyjke dks ?kk;y voLFkk esa mBk;k vkSj mlds flj ij mlh dh :eky cka/k nh] mDr ikapksa yksx mUgsa ns[kdj b/kj&m/kj Hkkx x;s] mUgksaus xksdqyjke dks vyoj vLirky esa HkrhZ djk;k rks MkWDVjksa us xksdqyjke dh gkyr xEHkhj crk;h] ftl ij mUgksaus xksdqyjke ds cM+s HkkbZ HkkSjsyky tks iqfyl ykbZu esa gSM dkWLVscy gS] mls tfj;s VsyhQksu bRryk nh ftl ij HkkSajsyky vyoj vLirky vk;k vkSj xksdqyjke dks t;iqj ys x;k] tgka ij HkrhZ djkrs gh xksdqyjke us ne rksM+ fn;k] fnukad 29-01-1994 dks xksdqyjke dh yk’k dks iksLVekWVZe gksus ds ckn xkao dkyh igkM+h iqfyl Fkkuk jktx<+ ysdj igqaps] tgka ij mlds ifjokj lfgr nkg&laLdkj djds vkt fnukad 30-01-1994 dks fjiksVZ djus vk;k gS] vr% izkFkZuk dh fd dkuwuh dk;Zokgh dh tkosA 3- mDr fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij iqfyl Fkkuk lnj] ftyk vyoj esa izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 20@1994 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 302 Hkk-na-la- esa ntZ dj vuqla/kku izkjaHk fd;k x;kA nkSjkus vuqla/kku vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxjQ~rkj fd;k x;k ,oa vfHk;qDrx.k [;kyh] jkts’k] yhyk ,oa lqjsUnz ds fo:) /kkjk 302 lifBr /kkjk 34 Hkk-n-l- esa vkjksi i= lacaf/kr U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftl ij ekeyk ls'ku U;k;ky; ds }kjk fopkj.kh; gksus ls fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] la[;k&1] vyoj dks varfjr fd;k x;kA

State v. Khayali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar @ Kankata S/O Shri Hargyan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Santu S/O Maniram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ved Rathore S/O Shri Harikishan Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Vs Sultan S/O Ramlal Bheel

State v. Khayali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ishwar @ Kankata S/O Shri Hargyan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Santu S/O Maniram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ved Rathore S/O Shri Harikishan Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

State of Vs Sultan S/O Ramlal Bheel

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Jasmeet Sodhi S/O Sh. Tejinder Singh Sodhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Satyanarayan Bagda S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan