Girraj and Ors. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the criminal appeal preferred by the appellants after recording a compromise between them and the victims. Giriraj was acquitted of Section 325 IPC and Banwari of Section 323 IPC.
What did the court decide?
Acquittal of Giriraj under Section 325 IPC and Banwari under Section 323 IPC by order of compromise; Appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 288/1996
- Giriraj Son of Shri Jankilal
2. Banwari Son of Shri Jankilal
Both are resident of Badoli, Police Station Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan).
----Appellants
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma Mr. S.S. Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order
04/07/2023
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal appeals need to be disposed of on account of compromise between the parties?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Giriraj Son of Shri Jankilal
- appellant
Banwari Son of Shri Jankilal
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/288/1996
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court