This court dismissed the State of Rajasthan's criminal appeal against the trial Court's acquittal of the accused, holding that no error of law was committed and there were no grounds to interfere with the benefit of doubt extended to the respondent.
The criminal appeal was dismissed and the judgment of acquittal was maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:41280]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1110/2017
State Of Rajasthan
----Appellant
Versus
Muzib Rahman Son Of Vaheed Ahmed, By Caste Musalman, Resident Of Swaroopganj, Tehsil Pindwara, District Sirohi.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. S.K. Bhati,PP |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Parihar |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Judgment
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON ::: 21/07/2023 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON ::: 06/ 12 /2023
BY THE COURT:-
(2 of 3) [CRLA-1110/2017]
[2023:RJ-JD:41280]
(3 of 3) [CRLA-1110/2017]
[2023:RJ-JD:41280]
interference. In the case at hand, no error of law has been found in the well reasoned judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Court, therefore, there appears no ground to interfere therein.
(FARJAND ALI),J
189-Mamta/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the trial Court's acquittal of the accused by extending the benefit of doubt.
State Of Rajasthan
Muzib Rahman Son Of Vaheed Ahmed
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
