This judgment allows the application for restoration of Civil Second Appeal No. 224/2016 under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC. The defect pointed out by the court office was removed, and the matter was restored to its original number and listed for further proceedings.
Civil Second Appeal No. 224/2016 restored to its original number; matter listed on 21.12.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:41129]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 91/2022
Rajpal Singh S/o Shri Karam Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 16-17 H, Dhanjatiya, Tehsil Karanpur Distt. Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
Hukma Ram S/o Shri Moman Ram, R/o 16-17 H, Dhanjatiya, Tehsil Karanpur Distt. Sri Ganganagar (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gyan Jyoti For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
29/11/2023
Defect No. 1 as pointed out by the office is removed by learned counsel for the appellant in the Court today.
Heard on application under Order 41 Rule 19 for restoration of appeal.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the grounds set out in the application for restoration, the same is allowed.
The Civil Second Appeal No. 224/2016 is restored to its original number.
Office to proceed.
List the matter on 21.12.2023.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
52-neha/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of appeal under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajpal Singh
Hukma Ram
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
