This court restored a civil appeal which was dismissed for default. The dismissal was set aside because the petitioner had no notice of the date of hearing. The appellant was directed to seek condensation of the default.
The appeal was restored and the default was condoned with a direction to file the list of issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 420/2019
Shakuntala Devi W/o Late Sh. Chimnaram
----Petitioner
Versus
Jagdish S/o Late Ramprasad
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Mathur For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
01/08/2023
vof/k vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 5 ds varxZr izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= la[;k 2246@2019 ij lquk x;kA
foyEc dk dkj.k ;g crk;k x;k gS fd os izdj.k dh nSfud okn lwph esa izdj.k dks ekdZ ugha dj lds Fks D;ksafd nSfud okn lwph ds vkf[kjh i`"B ij ntZ Fkk ,oa mUgsa flrEcj ekg esa bl ckr dh tkudkjh gqbZ fd izdj.k fujLr dj fn;k x;k gS] vr% foyEc dks {kek fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
fopkj fd;k x;kA vihy nkosnkjksa }kjk iapkV jkf'k esa o`f) fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA izkFkZuk&i= esa vafdr dkj.kksa ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ ds }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ds izdk'k esa U;k;fgr esa izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj izkFkZuk&i= izLrqfr esa gq, foyEc dks {kek fd;k tkrk gS rFkk izkFkZuk&i= dks le;kof/k esa ekuk tkrk gSA 'ks"k dk;kZy; vkifRr;ksa dks nwj fd;k tk pqdk gSA
ewy vihy la[;k 2743@2018 esa fnukad 19-01-2019 dks peremptory vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k Fkk ftlds vuqØe esa fnukad 01-04-2019 dks dk;kZy; }kjk vihy fujLr dj nh xbZ FkhA fnukad 19-01-2019 dks fdlh Hkh i{kdkj dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha Fkk blfy, bl izkFkZuk&i= ds uksfVl tkjh fd, tkus dh vko';drk ugha gSA
[CRES-420/2019]
fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ }kjk U;k;ky; esa vuqifLFkfr dk dkj.k ;g crk;k x;k gS fd fnukad 19-01-2019 ds vkns'k dh tkudkjh le; ij ugha gks ikbZ Fkh ,oa bl dkj.k dk;kZy;&vkifRr nwj ugha dj lds Fks rFkk vihy fujLr gks x;hA mudk rdZ gS fd ,slk vf/koDrk ds ifjofrZr fd, tkus ds dkj.k gks x;k FkkA vihy nkosnkjksa dh vksj ls izLrqr dj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa o`f) gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa vkns'k fnukad 01-04-2019 dks fjdkWy dj vihy dks iqu% lafLFkr fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA
fopkj fd;k x;kA vihykFkhZ }kjk iapkV jkf'k esa o`f) djk, tkus gsrq ;g vihy izLrqr dh xbZ Fkh] tks mlds egRoiw.kZ vf/kdkjksa ls lEcfU/kr gS] vr% izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% esa izkFkZuk&i= esa vafdr dkj.kksa ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk izkfFkZ;k }kjk izLrqr rdksZa ds izdk'k esa izLrqr izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj bl U;k;ky; dk iwoZ vkns'k fnukad 01-04-2019 okfil fy;k tkrk gS vkSj ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy la[;k 2743@2018 dks iqu% mlds ewy uacj ij lafLFkr fd, tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /55
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to restore the appeal dismissed by default due to absence of the petitioner on the first hearing date
Shakuntala Devi W/o Late Sh. Chimnaram
Jagdish S/o Late Ramprasad
SHUBHA MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
