Kamal Balani v. Bal Krishan Mondara
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the petitioner does not qualify for bail, warrant is quashed, and petitioner has no leave to appear in this bail matter.
Held that the petitioner does not qualify for bail, warrant is quashed, and petitioner has no leave to appear in this bail matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Restoration No. 6/2016
Kamal Balani S/o Shri Trilok Chandra Balani, aged about 50 years, R/o 21/232, Indira Nagar, P.S. Gazipur, Lucknow.
----Petitioner
Versus
Bal Krishan Mondara S/o Shri Jai Krishna Moondra, R/o C/o M/s. Charbhuja Sugar Works, 11 Ummer Hospital Road, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Kachhawaha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hari Prasad
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
08/05/2023
;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us fuosnu fd;k fd bl izdj.k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA blfy, vihy gh fu"izHkkoh gks pqdh gSA ,slh lwjr esa jsLVksjslu izkFkZuk&i= dks pykuk ugha pkgrs gSaA
vr% jsLVksjslu izkFkZuk&i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
29-mayank/-
Kamal Balani
Bal Krishan Mondara
Yogendra Kumar Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court