Kalawati v. Rajbala and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a civil revision petition held to be infructuous as the underlying suit was already decided. Pending stay petitions and applications are also dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as infructuous; stay petition and applications also dismissed.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:24849]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 83/2017
Kalawati W/o Shri Krishna Chandra, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Chak-1Msd, Tehsil Srivijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar.
----Petitioner
- Versus
- Rajbala W/o W/o Shri Surendra Kumar D/o Shri Ramesh Kumar, B/c Bishnoi,
- Krishna Devi W/o Ramesh Kumar, B/c Bishnoi, Through Vad Mitra, Rajbala, W/o Surendra Kumar, D/o Ram, Both Are Resident Of Chunawad, Tehsil And Distirct Sriganganagar.
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Hemant Jain |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : -- |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kalawati W/o Shri Krishna Chandra
- respondent
Rajbala W/o W/o Shri Surendra Kumar
- respondent
Krishna Devi W/o Ramesh Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/83/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court