Dismissed
Geeta v. Harsukh Ram
Rajasthan HCCR/41/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision dismissed as withdrawn. Court observed that the time taken by petitioners in pursuing the proceedings shall be excluded for limitation purposes.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the revision petition granted with exclusion of time from limitation clock.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2023:RJ-JD:20342]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 41/2023
¶4
- Geeta D/o Shri Harsukhram, Aged About 59 Years, W/o Shri Mangilal, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Nadsar, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
¶5
- Sita D/o Shri Harsukh Ram, Aged About 57 Years, W/o Shri Babulal, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Nadsar, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
¶6
----Petitioners
¶7
Versus
¶8
- Harsukh Ram S/o Shri Chotha Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Nadsar, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
¶9
- Sivraj D/o Shri Harsukh Ram, W/o Shri Ramjeewan, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Nadsar, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
¶10
- Bhatiya D/o Shri Harsukh, W/o Sharwan Ram, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Village Bhango Ki Dhani, Bhopalgarh, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
¶11
- Registrar Officer, Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Geeta D/o Shri Harsukhram
- petitioner
Sita D/o Shri Harsukh Ram
- respondent
Harsukh Ram S/o Shri Chotha Ram
- respondent
Sivraj D/o Shri Harsukh Ram
- respondent
Bhatiya D/o Shri Harsukh
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CR/41/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court