Petitioners sought relief regarding a premise deemed vacated. The High Court dismissed the special miscellaneous application as infructuous due to the change in status of the property.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:26605]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Misc. Application No. 48/2020
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CMAP-48/2020]
[2023:RJ-JD:26605]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chaitanya Kumar Gehlot
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
23/08/2023
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the premise in question has already been vacated and therefore, the present application has rendered infructuous.
In view of the submission made, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(REKHA BORANA),J
56-KashishS/-
Ganga Devi W/o Late Shri Mahendra Singh Gaurwa
Uma Devi D/o Late Shri Mahendra Singh Gaurwa
Ganpat Lal
Madhubala W/o Late Shri Ganpat Lal
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
