Allowed

Ramesh Chandra v. Smt. Ugam Devi (Died)

Rajasthan HC12 Jul 2023CMAP/32/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Jodhpur allowed an application under Order 13 Rule 9 and Section 151 CPC. The court directed the return of the original Power of Attorney to the appellant after verifying the compromise and placing the certified copy on record.

What did the court decide?

The original Power of Attorney dated 08.04.2004 executed by Ramesh Chandra Parashar in favour of Dinesh Chandra Sharma be returned to counsel for the appellant.

Ramesh Chandra Vs Smt. Ugam Devi (Died) — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:21166]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Misc. Application No. 32/2023

¶4

Ramesh Chandra S/o Shri Kalyanmal, Aged About 79 Years, By Caste Parashar, Resident Of Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Ugam Devi (Died), Through Rajendra Prasad Kogta S/o Late Shri Sohan Lal Resident Of 240, Kanchipuram, Bhilwara.

¶8

Shri Suresh Chandra (Died), Through Smt. Sonika Jain D/o Late Shri Suresh Chandra Jain W/o Shri Sandeep Jain (Daughter), Age 47 Years, Resident Of 50 J, K-Block, Kidwai Nagar, Kanpur Nagar (U.P.)

¶9

Municipal Council Bhilwara, Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Council, Bhilwara.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Sharma

¶12

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

¶13

Order

¶14

12/07/2023

¶15

An application under Order 13 Rule 9 read with Section 151, CPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant with a submission that the present second appeal was disposed of in terms of the compromise as entered into between the parties. For the purposes of verification of the compromise, the original Power of Attorney as executed by appellant Ramesh Chandra in favour of Dinesh Chandra Sharma, had been submitted before the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) and the same forms a part of the record.

¶16

As now the appeal has been disposed of, the said original Power of Attorney deserves to be returned back to the appellant.

(2 of 2)

[2023:RJ-JD:21166]

[CMAP-32/2023]

The certified copy of the said Power of Attorney has been placed on record along with the present application.

¶21

In view of the submissions made in the application, the same is allowed . It is hereby directed that the original Power of Attorney dated 08.04.2004 executed by Ramesh Chandra Parashar in favour of Dinesh Chandra Sharma be returned back to counsel for the appellant after taking due receipt of the same from him. The certified copy of the Power of Attorney as filed along with the present application be placed on record of the second appeal.

¶22

(REKHA BORANA),J

¶23

45-T.Singh/-

Ramesh Chandra v. Smt. Ugam Devi (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Chandra v. Smt. Ugam Devi (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumar Vs Veer Singh

Mohd. Gulsher Khan Vs Umardaraj Khan

Uda Dangi Vs Kanna Ji Dangi and Ors.

Natharam and Ors. Vs Kesaram and Anr.

Shankar Dass Vs Mohit Goyal

Lrs of Balkrishan Vs Lrs of Maghraj and Ors.