This appeal upheld an interim order directing the High Court to facilitate maintenance for the appellant at the rate of Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 4,000 per month from each respondent's income, subject to a hearing at the Bikaner court.
Order passed directing the High Court to enforce maintenance payment of Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 4,000 per month from the respondents' income.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:27797]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 99/2023
Vijeta Chouhan W/o Late Shri Prem Prakash, Aged About 30 Years, Teacher At Present Posted At Government High Primary School Mootipura Bas, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh And Second Address- Ward No. 22 LBS School Road, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. |
D.L. Rawla |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Jagdish Kumar Bishnoi | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Rakesh Matoria |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Judgment
02/09/2023
/kkjk 47 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds v/khu ;g fofo/k nhokuh vihy] vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh us fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] Hkknjk ds }kjk fofo/k nhokuh izdj.k la[;k 04@2022] xkSjh'kadj cuke fotsrk pkSgku esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-10-2022 ds fo#) izLrqr dh gS] ftlds }kjk fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k us izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr /kkjk 12 laj{kd vkSj izfrikY; vf/kfu;e] 1890 dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh us ;g vihy izLrqr dh gSA
(2 of 3) [CMA-99/2023]
[2023:RJ-JD:27797]
02eSaus mHk;i{kksa ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquh ,oa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
03fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-10-2022 dk izHkkoh Hkkx fuEufyf[kr gS %&
ßmDr izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 12 laj{kd vkSj izfrikY; vf/kfu;e] 1890 Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vizkfFkZuh dks vius ukckfyx iq= tSfuy dks gj ekg esa 15 fnu ds varjky ls izR;sd lkseokj dks lqcg 10%00 cts ls 'kke 4%00 cts rd izkFkhZx.k ls feykus ds funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSA izkFkhZx.k dks ukckfyx tSfuy ls feyokus ds fy, nksuksa i{kksa }kjk lgefr o lqfo/kk ls LFkku fu;r fd;k tkosA vxj nksuksa i{kksa ukckfyx tSfuy ls izkFkhZx.k dks feykus ds LFkku lgefr ugha curh gS rks U;k;ky; esa feyok;s tkus gsrq ikcan jgsaxsAÞ
04;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh us ;g O;Dr fd;k fd vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh ,d v/;kfidk gS ,oa mls 15 fnu ds varjky ls izR;sd lkseokj lqcg 10%00 cts ls 'kke 4%00 cts rd vo;Ld dks feyokus gsrq ,d fnu dk vodk'k ysuk iM+rk gSA ,d o"kZ esa 15 fnu gh vkdfLed vodk'k ns; gksrk gSA vo;Ld dks izR;sd ekg esa nks ckj izR;FkhZx.k ls feyokus ds fy, ys tkus ij ,d o"kZ esa djhc 24 fnu dk vodk'k ysuk iM+sxkA ;g Hkh O;Dr fd;k fd U;k;ky; ifjlj esa feyokus ls vo;Ld ij izfrdwy izHkko iM+us dh laHkkouk gSA vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k esa lkseokj ds LFkku ij jfookj dk fnol fu;r dj vo;Ld ls feyokus gsrq U;k;ky; ifjlj ds ikl LFkku fu/kkZfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
05;ksX; vf/koDrk izR;FkhZx.k us mDr rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;k vkSj ;g O;Dr fd;k fd vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr gksus ds i'pkr~ vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh }kjk fu;fer :i ls vo;Ld dks izR;FkhZx.k ls ugha feyok;k tk jgk gSA mUgksaus ;g Hkh O;Dr fd;k fd U;k;ky; ifjlj ds ikl fLFkr xka/kh ikdZ] Hkknjk dk LFkku vo;Ld ls izR;FkhZx.k dks feyokus gsrq mfpr gSA mUgksaus bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.
(3 of 3) [CMA-99/2023]
[2023:RJ-JD:27797]
58/2023 Nidhi Bansal Versus Punit Bansal & Anr. esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 06-04-2023 dh izfr izLrqr dh] ftldk eSaus voyksdu fd;kA
06eSaus mi;qZDr ijLij fojks/kh rdksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izdj.k ds rF;] ifjfLFkfr;ksa vkfn dks ns[krs gq, fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-10-2022 ifjofrZr fd;k tkdj ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ vizkfFkZuh vius vo;Ld iq= tSfuy dks izR;FkhZx.k izkFkhZx.k ls izR;sd ekg ds f}rh; ,oa prqFkZ jfookj dks lqcg 10%00 cts ls 'kke 4%00 cts rd] U;k;ky; ifjlj ds ikl fLFkr xka/kh ikdZ] Hkknjk esa feyok;saA
07rn~uqlkj ;g vihy fu.khZr dh tkrh gSA
08bl vihy ds fuLrkj.k ds lkFk gh bl vihy ls lacaf/kr fofo/k nhokuh LFkxu izkFkZuk i= la[;k 101@2023 dks Hkh mi;qZDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
77-Rajendra/-
;g vkns'[email protected]; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku d s vuqPNsn
348(i) ds rgr Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk jkti= la[;k 1] fnuakd 2 tuojh 1999 ,oa jktLFkku jkti= fnukafdr 10-3-1971 ds rgr fgUnh Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx dk s izkf/kd`r fd, tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i fgUnh Hkk"kk esa fy[kk;k x;kA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the provision of Section 125 CrPC regarding maintenance can be enforced through a writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nidhi Bansal Versus Punit Bansal & Anr.Followed¶24
Nidhi Bansal Versus Punit Bansal & Anr.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vijeta Chouhan
Gouri Shankar
Geeta Devi
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
