Supreme Court Civil Miscellaneous Appeal dismissed as the underlying matter became infructuous. A single paragraph order by a single judge records the cancellation of the appeal without substantive analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 615/2018
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. CP Soni For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Order
18/04/2023
[CMA-615/2018]
(2 of 2)
Learned counsel for the appellants states that the misc. appeal
has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the misc. appeal is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J
54-Arti/-
Smt. Indira Merik W/o Late Shri Wilfred Merik
Smt. Morin James W/o Late Shri Aswini James
Johnson S/o Late Shri Wilfred Merik
Priest Manish Rao
Waris K Masih Bisap
The State Of Rajasthan
YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
