In S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 464/2020, the High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution after no one appeared on behalf of the appellant in the second round of hearings.
Dismissal of civil miscellaneous appeal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:33459]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 464/2020
Babulal S/o Jagdishji, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of 52, Jamadaron Ki Dhani, Falyawas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Appellant
Versus
[2023:RJ-JP:33459]
[CMA-464/2020]
(2 of 3)
(Raj)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None For : None Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
06/11/2023
No one was present on behalf of the appellant even in second round.
[2023:RJ-JP:33459] (3 of 3)
[CMA-464/2020]
In view of above, the civil misc. appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /108
1 issue framed by the court
Whether civil miscellaneous appeal should be allowed or dismissed for want of prosecution?
Babulal S/o Jagdishji
Ram Niwas S/o Shri Kalyan
Ramavatar S/o Shri Kalyan
Smt. Dhapu Devi W/o Late Shri Jagdish
Ashok Gurjar S/o Late Shri Jagdish
Bhagwan Sahai S/o Late Shri Jagdish
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
