The appellate court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal because the appellant's counsel declined to press the appeal before the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JP:13657]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3841/2015
Smt Prem Devi w/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Kumawat, age about 52 years, Natural Guardian of her minor son Kamlesh s/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Kumawat, Resident of Village Panwalia, Tenshil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
: Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
07/07/2023
Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press the appeal.
Hence, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Keshav/40
Smt Prem Devi w/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Kumawat
Smt Chota Devi D/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Kumawat
Aachuki D/o Late Shri Gopal Lal Kumawat
The District Collector, Collectorate Banipark, Jaipur
Tehsildar, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur
BHUWAN GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
