Allowed

Smt. Rajwati W/O Shivsingh v. Ajeet Kumar S/O Rajendra Singh

Rajasthan HC20 Oct 2023CMA/2158/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a death compensation claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the appellant's appeal by quashing the respondent insurer's order. The Court held that compensation must be calculated using five statutory categories (spousal, parental, filial consortium) plus conventional heads, resulting in a total award of Rs. 63.13 Lakhs. The High Court also clarified that income

What did the court decide?

The compensation order of the Revenue Commissioner was quashed and the total compensation fixed at Rs. 63,13,452/- payable by the Insurer to the Appellants.

Smt. Rajwati W/O Shivsingh Vs Ajeet Kumar S/O Rajendra Singh — Insurance | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2158/2020

¶3

Smt. Rajwati W/o Shivsingh, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶4

Madhav Singh S/o Late Shri Satish Chand, Aged About 5 Years, Minor Through His Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Namita Chaudhary W/o Late Satish Chand. R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶5

Namita Chaudhary W/o Late Satish Chand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶6

Shobha D/o Shivsingh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶7

Pinki D/o Shivsingh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶8

Bhola @ Rahul Singh Shivsingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Ajan, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.

¶9

----Appellants

¶10

Versus

¶11

Ajeet Kumar S/o Rajendra Singh, R/o Nagla Hindu, District Hathras (Up) (Owner Of Vehicle Car No. Up-70-Q6979)

¶12

Yogesh Kumar S/o Jagan Prasad, R/o Sainthra, Tehsil And District Bharatpur (Driver Of Vehicle Car No. Up-70-Q6979)

¶13

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Branch Office Nayi Mandi, Station Road, Bharatpur Service Through Branch Manager (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Car No. Up-70-Q-6979)

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Navankur Dube For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.P.Mathur

¶16

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

Order

Reserved on

Pronounced on

[CMA-2158/2020]

04/10/2023

(2 of 8)

vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Hkjriqj ¼ftls vkxs vf/kdj.k ls lEcksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok la[;k& 834@2016 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vokMZ fnukad 05-12-2019 ] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj ds i{k esa dqy {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 52]24]111@& :i;s dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k x;k] ls O;fFkr gksdj ,oa mDr {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa o`f) fd, tkus ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶24

la{ksi esa izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj fnukad 03-04-2016 dks lrh'k pan ds eksVjlkbZfdy ij lokj gksdj tkrs gq, ds nkSjku ihNs ls dkj pkyd }kjk viuk okgu rst o ykijokghiwoZd pykrs gq, VDdj ekjus ds ifj.kkeLo:i mDr O;fDr lrh'k pan dh eR;q gksus ij erd ds vkfJrx.k ¼vihykFkhZx.k½ dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/kdj.k esa Dyse izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fofHkUu enksa esa {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fnyk, tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA foi{kh dh vksj ls tokc izLrqr fd;k x;kA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds }kjk i{kdkjksa ds vfHkopuksa ds vk/kkj ij fook|d fojfpr fd;s x;sA i{kdkjksa dh lk{; ys[kc) dh xbZA rRi'pkr fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk nksuksa i{kksa ds rdZ lquus ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k ekSf[kd ,oa nLrkosth lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vkyksP; fu.kZ; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 52]24]111@& :i;s e; C;kt fnykbZ xbZ] ftlesa o`f) fd;s tkus gsrq vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj dh vksj ls ;g vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ gS fd fnukad 03-04-2016 dks Jh lrh'k pan dh eR;q gks xbZ Fkh vkSj vihykFkhZx.k mlds fof/kd izfrfuf/kx.k ,oa vkfJr gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd erd mRrj izns'k ljdkj esa vkj{kh ds in ij fu;qDr FkkA fo}ku vf/kdj.k us mlds osru dk lgh izdkj ls vkdyu ugha fd;k gSA erd ds nks osru izek.k&i= izn'kZ&7 ,oa izn'kZ&15 izLrqr fd, x, gSaA izn'kZ&7 osru izek.k&i= esa erd dk osru 22458@& :i;s ,oa izn'kZ&15 esa osru 26856@& :i;s vafdr gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vf/kdj.k us ekpZ ekg ds osru dks vk/kkj cukdj e`rd dh ekfld vk; fu/kkZfjr dh gS tcfd lkroka osru vk;ksx ykxw gks tkus ls vizsy ekg lu 2016 esa mldk osru izn'kZ&15 ds vuqlkj c<+k;k tkuk pkfg,A

¶26

[CMA-2158/2020]

¶27

(3 of 8)

¶28

mudk rdZ gS fd fnukad 03-04-2016 dks Jh lrh'k pan dh eR;q gqbZ gS vkSj ml fnu lkroka osru vk;ksx ykxw gksus ij mldk osru 26856@& gtkj :i;s gks x;k Fkk] vr% vf/kdj.k dks pkfg, Fkk fd os eR;q dh frfFk ij tks osru Fkk mlh dks fopkj esa ysrs gq, {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fu/kkZfjr djrs ijUrq mUgksaus e`R;q ds ekg ls Bhd igys okys ekg dh vk; dks vk/kkj cukdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fu/kkZfjr dh gS tks lgh ugha gSA

¶29

mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k us ikjEifjd en esa e`rd dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh gkfu dh {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa ,deq'r 40]000@&:i;s dh jkf'k fnyokbZ gS tcfd vihykFkhZx.k izR;sd dks jkf'k 40]000@&:i;s ds vuqlkj fnykbZ tkuh pkfg, FkhA

¶30

mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd us'kuy ba';ksjsUl dEiuh&cuke&iz.k; lsBh ,oa jktorh mQZ jTtks ,oa vU;&cuke&;wukbZVsM bf.M;k ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM ,oa vU; ds fu.kZ; ds vuq:i gj o"kZ 10 izfr'kr dh of) djds mDr jkf'k fnykbZ tkuh pkfg, FkhA vihykFkhZx.k tks fd erd dh iRuh] lUrku ,oa ekrk gSa os Hkh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh oapuk dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa izR;sd 40]000@&:i;s vFkok c<+h gqbZ jkf'k izR;sd 44]000@&:i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA

¶31

mudk rdZ gS fd mDr vk/kkjksa ds vfrfjDr vf/kdj.k ds iapkV dks fdlh Hkh vU; izdkj ls dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nh tk jgh gSA

¶32

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj us vius mDr rdksZ ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p; izLrqr fd;s ,oa buesa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k c<+k, tkus ,oa izkFkZuk&i= izLrqfr ls C;kt fnyk, tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶33

1- National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680

¶34

2- New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Somwati & Ors. (2020) 9 SCC 644

¶35

3- Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130

¶36

4- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder (2020) Supreme Court (SC) 425

¶37

[CMA-2158/2020]

¶38

(4 of 8)

¶39

blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh dk rdZ gS fd vf/kdj.k us izn'kZ&7 osru izek.k&i= dks vk/kkj cukdj vk; fu/kkZfjr dh gS tks fof/klEer gSA mudk rdZ gS fd fnukad 03-04-2016 dks lrh'k pan dh eR;q gqbZ gS vkSj eR;q ls Bhd iwoZ tks osru e`rd us izkIr fd;k gS] og izn'kZ&7 osru izek.k&i= esa mYysf[kr gS vkSj blh vk/kkj ij mldh vk; fu/kkZfjr dh tk ldrh gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izn'kZ&15 izek.k&i= esa rks ;g vafdr gS fd ;fn og fnukad 03-04-2016 dks thfor gksrk rks izn'kZ&15 esa vafdr osru izkIr djrk tcfd ml fnu lrh'k pan thfor ugha Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa bl izek.k&i= ij fo'okl djds vk; fu/kkZfjr ugha dh tk ldrh gSA

¶40

mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd U;kf;d fofu'p; National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680 esa dsoy iRuh dks gh vius thoulkFkh dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z (Spousal Consortium) ds :i esa 40]000@& :i;s fnyk, x, gSa ,oa blh izdkj dk fl)kUr ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p; Jhjke tujy ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM&cuke&Hkxr flag ,oa vU; ,l,yih uacj 1185&1186 lu 2021 esa izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA vr% mDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa ds izdk'k esa dsoy iRuh dks gh ;g jkf'k fnykbZ tkuh pkfg,A fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk tks {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS og i;kZIr ,oa U;k;laxr gS] ftlesa fdlh Hkh izdkj dk gLr{ksi fd, tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSA vr% vihy fujLruh; gS] fujLr dh tk,A

¶41

mHk; i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZa ij euu fd;kA vkykSP; fu.kZ; ,oa izLrqr U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA

¶42

vk; dh {kfr (Loss of Income)

¶43

izdj.k esa iz'uxr nq?kZVuk fnukad 03-04-2016 dks gksuk Lohdr rF; gSa fo}ku vf/kdj.k us erd lrh'k pan dks i=koyh ij vkbZ lk{; ds vk/kkj ij mRrj izns'k jkT; esa vkj{kh ds in ij gksuk ekudj mldh vk; dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k gSA vf/kdj.k ds le{k e`rd dk osru osru izek.k&i= izn'kZ&7 o 15 izLrqr fd, x,

¶44

[CMA-2158/2020]

¶45

(5 of 8)

¶46

Fks] ftuesa izn'kZ&7 esa mldk ldy osru 22458 @& :i;s vafdr gS] tcfd izn'kZ&15 esa mldk osru lkrosa osru vk;ksx ds i'pkr~ osru fLFkjhdj.k djus ij izkIr gksus okyk osru n'kkZ;k gqvk gS tks 26856@&:i;s gSA ;g Lohdr rF; gS fd erd dh eR;q fnukad 03-04-2016 dks gqbZ gS ,oa lkroka osru vk;ksx 01-04-2016 ls izHkko esa vkuk crk;k x;k gS] ftlds vuqlkj erd ds vafre osru tks izn'kZ&7 esa nf'kZr gS] esa iqu% osru fLFkjhdj.k fd;k tkuk vfuok;Z Fkk ,oa blh vuqlkj osru fLFkjhdj.k djds mldk osru 26856@&:i;s gksuk izn'kZ&15 esa nf'kZr fd;k x;k gS] ftl ij vfo'okl fd, tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj ugha gSA dksbZ Hkh osru fLFkjhdj.k fuf'pr dh xbZ frfFk ls gh fd;k tkuk gksrk gS ,oa orZeku ekeys esa izn'kZ&15 ls ;g Li"Vr% izekf.kr gS fd fnukad 01-04-2016 ls osru fLFkjhdj.k ds i'pkr~ erd dk osru 26856@&:i;s ekfld gksuk fuf'pr Fkk ftldk ykHk mlds ifjokj dks izkIr gksrkA erd dh eR;q ds i'pkr fnukad 01-04-2016 ls 03-04-2016 rd rhu fnu dk osru Hkh mls pqdk;k x;k gS] tks osru varj rkfydk ls nf'kZr gSA vr% erd dk ekfld osru 26856 @& :i;s ekudj gh gekjs fopkj ls vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ dh x.kuk dh tkuh pkfg, FkhA vr% bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa vk; dh {kfr ds fu/kkZj.k ds dze esa e`rd dh ekfld vk; 26856@& :i;s ekuk tkuk ;qfDr;qDr ,oa U;k;laxr gSA mDrkuqlkj x.kuk djus ij okf"kZd vk; 3]22]272@& :i;s ekuh tkrh gSA

¶47

vr% vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk fu/kkZj.k fuEukuqlkj fd;k tkuk mfpr gS %&

¶48

Ø-la-	en	{kfriwfrZ jkf'k
1-	e`rd dh okf"kZd vk;	3,22,272/-
2-	Hkfo"; esa gksusokyh vk; dh o`f) dh izR;k'kk	1,61,136/- (50% of the income)
3-	;ksx	4,83,408/-
4-	e`rd }kjk Lo;a ij fd;s tkusokys [kpZ dh dVkSrh ¼1@4½	1,20,852/- (1/4 of 483408)
5-	mDr dVkSrh ds i'pkr 'ks"k jkf'k ¼vihykFkhZx.k dh okf"kZd fuHkZjrk½	483408-120852=362556/-
6-	e`rd dh vk;q ds vk/kkj ij iz;ksT; xq.kd	17
7-	vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k	362556x17=61,63,452/-

¶49

(6 of 8) [CMA-2158/2020]

¶50

vr% fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k 51]54]111@& :i;s esa 10]09]341@& :i;s dh o`f) djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; ds }kjk vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i 61]63]452@& :i;s jkf'k fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA

¶51

ikjEifjd en (Conventional Heads)

¶52

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder (2020) Supreme Court (SC) 425, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Somwati & Ors. (2020) 9 SCC 644 & Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa ikjEifjd enksa dks ifjHkkf"kr djrs gq, mlesa {kfriwfrZ jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gSA

¶53

tgka rd fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p; Jhjke tujy ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM&cuke&Hkxr flag jkor ,oa vU; esa erd dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh oapuk dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i ,deq'r 40]000@&:i;s dh jkf'k gh bl en esa fnyk, tkus dk rdZ gS rks bl lEcU/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu'p; United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder (2020) Supreme Court (SC) 425 tks rhu lnL;h; ihB }kjk ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] esa erd ds izR;sd vkfJr dks mldh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh oapuk dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ gsrq 40]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fnyok, tkus dk fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mlls mUgsa dksbZ ykHk izkIr ugha gksrk gSA

¶54

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls U;kf;d fofu'p; jktorh mQZ jTtks ,oa vU;&cuke&;wukbZVsM bf.M;k ba';ksjsal daiuh fyfeVsM izLrqr dj laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh oapuk dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izR;sd dks 40]000@&:i;s ds LFkku ij mlesa 10 izfr'kr o`f) djrs gq, 44]000@&:i;s fnyk, tkus ,oa nkg laLdkj ,oa lEifRr dh gkfu ds en esa Hkh 15]000@&:i;s ds LFkku ij 20]000@&:i;s izR;sd en esa fnyk, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k gS rks bl lEcU/k esa gekjs fopkj ls National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017)

¶55

[CMA-2158/2020]

¶56

(7 of 8)

¶57

16 SCC 680 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr dk vuqlj.k fd;k tkuk mfpr gS] tks fd ogn ihB dk fu.kZ; gS ,oa ftlds vuqlkj erd dh laxfr] Lusg] lkgp;Z dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i 40]000@&:i;s ,oa nkg laLdkj rFkk lEifRr dh gkfu dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i 15&15 gtkj :i;s dh jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gSaA

¶58

orZeku izdj.k esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rd dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z dh gkfu dh {kfriwfrZ Lo:i lHkh ;[email protected] dks ,deq'r jkf'k 40]000 @&:i;s ,oa nkg laLdkj ds en esa 15000@& :i;s rFkk lEink dh gkfu ds en esa 15]000 @&:i;s] bl izdkj dqy jkf'k 70]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fnyokbZ gSa] tks gekjs fopkj ls mDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa ds izdk'k esa la'kksf/kr dj fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA

¶59

vr% mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa dh jks'kuh esa erd dh iRuh dks thoulkFkh dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z (Spousal Consortium) dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa] erd dh lUrku dks vius firk dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z (Parental Consortium) dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa rFkk e`rd dh ekrk dks vius iq= dh laxfr] Lusg ,oa lkgp;Z (Filial Consortium) dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ ds :i esa] izR;sd dks 40000@& :i;s vFkkZr (40,000x3=1,20,000) :i;s dqy 1]20]000@&:i;s] nkg laLdkj dh en esa 15]000@& :i;s ,oa lEifRr dh gkfu dh {kfriwfrZ gsrq 15]000@& :i;s bl izdkj dqy jkf'k 1]50]000@& :i;s dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k bl en esa fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA

¶60

vr% fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa fnykbZ xbZ 70]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k esa 80]000@& :i;s dh o`f) djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; }kjk 1]50]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA

¶61

bl izdkj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj dks fnykbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa mi;ZqDrkuqlkj o`f) djrs gq, fuEukuqlkj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dk fu/kkZj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

¶62

Ø-la-	en	{kfriwfrZ jkf'k
1-	vk; dh {kfr dh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k	61,63,452/-
2-	ikjEifjd en dh jkf'k	1,50,000/-
3-	dqy {kfriwfrZ jkf'k	6163452+150000=
		63,13,452/-

¶63

[CMA-2158/2020]

¶64

(8 of 8)

¶65

ifj.kker% fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj dks fnykbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 52]24]111@& :i;s esa mi;qZDrkuqlkj 10]89]341@& :i;s dh o`f) djrs gq, djrs gq, bl U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k&nkosnkj ds i{k esa dqy {kfriwfrZ jkf'k 63]13]452@& :i;s dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZx.k }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh xbZ jkf'k dqy {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa lek;ksftr gksxhA

¶66

tgkWa rd C;kt dk iz'u gS] ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dh jks'kuh esa c<+h gqbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij C;kt nj] C;kt izkIr djus dh frfFk rFkk {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ds vkuqikfrd forj.k ds dze esa leLr 'krZsa fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds vkns'kkuqlkj izHkkoh ,oa ;Fkkor jgsaxhA

¶67

mi;qZDrkuqlkj vihy fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA rnuqlkj yafcr izkFkZuk i=] ;fn dksbZ gks] fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶68

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /

Smt. Rajwati W/O Shivsingh v. Ajeet Kumar S/O Rajendra Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Rajwati W/O Shivsingh v. Ajeet Kumar S/O Rajendra Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R S R T C Jaipur Vs Smt Rukma and Ors.

Smt. Geeta Devi W/O Sohanlal Verma Vs Shriram S/O Ratanlal Soni

Smt Suva Devi W/O Late Shri Heera Lal Vs Bhawani Singh S/O Shri Ladu Singh

Smt Sunita Devi Vs Hansraj and Ors.

Ramwati Wife of Late Shri Ramcharan, Vs Sapat Kha Son of Roopa Kha

Smt Bhudei W/O Maharaj Singh Vs General Manager, Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation