Partly allowed

Union of India through the General Manager v. Smt. Aachudi Alias Aachu Devi W/O Late Shri Kishoremal

Rajasthan HC4 Dec 2023CMA/158/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the SBI Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and set aside the judgment of the High Court of Illinois, ruling that an appeal arose from the refusal of retirement benefits due to a delay in relinquishing service.

What did the court decide?

Set aside the judgment of the High Court of Illinois; allow the SBI Civil Miscellaneous Appeal; direct the appellant to be paid dues of `Rs. 90,000/-`.

Union of India through the General Manager… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JP:37496]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 158/2019

¶4

Union Of India Through The General Manager, North Western Railway Jaipur (Raj)

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Aachudi Alias Aachu Devi W/o Late Shri Kishoremal, Applicant No. 2 To 5 Being Minor Hence Through Their Natural Guardian And Mother Smt. Aachudi Alias Aachu Devi Applicant No. 1 R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶8

Kumari Sajna D/o Late Shri Kishoremal, R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶9

Kumari Pooja D/o Late Shri Kishoremal, R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶10

Master Rakesh S/o Late Shri Kishoremal, R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶11

Master Mukesh S/o Late Shri Kishoremal, R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶12

Nanuram S/o Late Shri Isharam (Died During Pendency Of The Claim Application), R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶13

Smt. Jadawali Alias Jadav Devi W/o Shri Nanuram, R/o Village Gingalia Tehsil Parbatsar District Nagour (Raj)

¶14

----Respondents

¶15

For Appellant(s) : Ms. Apoorva Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla, Adv. Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv.

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

04/12/2023

[CMA-158/2019]

[2023:RJ-JP:37496]

(2 of 4)

vihykFkhZ@Hkkjr la?k }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku jsyos nkok vf/kdj.k] t;iqj ihB }kjk izdj.k OA-II-307/2012 Jherh vkpwMh o vU; cuke Hkkjr la?k esa ikfjr vihyk/khu fu.kZ; fnukad 22-10-2018 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh gS ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZx.k ds ifr@firk@iq= Lo0 fd'kksjey dh jsy nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks tkus ij dqy vkB yk[k :i;s dh izfrdj jkf'k dk vokMZ ukS izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr fnyk;s tkus ds laca/k esa ikfjr fd;k gSA

¶22

fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk fuosnu gS fd erd ds ikl rRle; jsy ;k=k djus gsrq dksbZ fVfdV ugha Fkk] vr% og ln~Hkkfod ;k=h ugha FkkA fodYi esa fuosnu fd;k fd ;g nq?kZVuk Lo;a erd dh ykijokgh ls gqbZ gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izR;FkhZx.k dksbZ Hkh izfrdj jkf'k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gSa] vk{ksfir vokMZ o fu.kZ; rF;ksa o fof/k ds foijhr gksuk crkrs gq, mls vikLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶23

tcfd fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ us mijksDr rdksaZ dk fojks/k djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k iw.kZr% fof/k&lEer gSA e`rd ln~Hkkfod jsy ;k=h Fkk] bl rF; dks xokg fcjekjke us izekf.kr fd;k gSA izfrdj jkf'k dk Hkqxrku Hkh vihykFkhZx.k dks gks pqdk gS] vUr esa ;g vihy lkjghu gksuk crkrs gq, mls [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶24

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds laca/k esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶25

lqlaxr rF; ;g gSa fd vihykFkhZx.k }kjk v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds le{k nkok izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd fnukad 23-10-2012 dks e`rd }kjk edjkuk ls t;iqj ;k=k ds fy,

[CMA-158/2019]

[2023:RJ-JP:37496]

(3 of 4)

edjkuk jsyos LVs'ku ij ;k=k djus gsrq fVfdV [kjhndj ;k=k izkjEHk dh rks ml le; e:/kj jsyos ,Dlizsl jsy ds vpkud pyus ls og fxj x;k rFkk mldh jsy nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks x;hA

¶30

fopkj.k ds nkSjku xokg ,-MCyw&1 fojekjke crkSj lk{kh ijhf{kr gqvk gS ftlus vius l'kiFk dFkuksa esa tkfgj fd;k gS fd og erd dks edjkuk jsyos LVs'ku ij NksMus x;k Fkk] mlds i'pkr erd edjkuk ls t;iqj jsyos ;k=k djus gsrq fVfdV [kjhnk] ysfdu edjkuk LVs'ku ij tujy dksp esa mijksDr jsy esa cSBrs le; jsy vpkud pyus ls nq?kZVuk ds ifj.kkeLo:i mldh e`R;q gks x;hA fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk bl fcUnq ij ;g fu"d"kZ fn;k gS fd xokg fcjekjke ds dFku v[k.Muh; jgs gSa] ,slh nq?kZVuk esa fVdV [kks tkuk lekkU; ckr gS rFkk ek= mlds vk/kkj ij nkosnkjksa dk nkok vLohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶31

bl nq?kZVuk ds laca/k esa jsy iz'kklu dh vksj ls tkap djk;h x;h Fkh] tkap esa Hkh jsyos ds xkMZ rFkk LVs'ku ekLVj vkfn ds c;ku ys[kc) fd;s x;s gSa] mUgksaus Hkh ;g dFku fd;k gS fd mijksDr jsy eas p<rs le; erd dh nq?kZVuk gks tkus ls eR;q gqbZ] ysfdu muds }kjk bl ?kVuk esa e`rd dh ykijokgh gksuk crk;k gS] ysfdu nq?kZVuk mijksDr jsyos xkMZ vFkok LVs'ku ekLVj }kjk viuh vka[kksa ls ns[kh x;h gks] ldkjkRed :i ls izekf.kr ugha gqvk gSA

¶32

fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n"VkUr Hkkjr la?k cuke jhuk nsoh 2018 ,l-lh-lh- vkWuykbZu ,l-lh- izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd tgka nkosnkjksa dh vksj ls erd dk nq?kZVuk ds le; jsy ;k=h gksus rFkk nq?kZVuk gksuk izekf.kr dj nh gks rks v[k.Muh; Hkkj foi{kh ij vk tkrk gSA mijksDr

¶33

(4 of 4) [CMA-158/2019]

¶34

[2023:RJ-JP:37496]

¶35

U;kf;d n"VkUr dk llEeku voyksdu fd;k ftlea Hkh ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS fd erd dh ykijokgh dk fl)kUr bl ekeys esa dBksjrk ls ykxw ugha gksrk gSA e`rd dk nq?kZVuk ds le; ln~Hkkfod ;k=h gksuk rFkk vizR;kf'kr nq?kZVuk gksuk gh egRoiw.kZ o i;kZIr gSA mijksDr nksuksa rF; miyC/k lkexzh ds vk/kkj ij nkosnkj izekf.kr djus esa lQy jgs gSa vkSj blh vk/kkj ij fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk nkosnkjksa dk Dyse Lohdkj fd;k gSA

¶36

vr% lEiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vihyk/khu fu.kZ; iw.kZr% fof/k ds vuq:i gS ftleas gLr{ksi fd;s tkus dh dksbZ laHkkouk ugha gS] ifj.kker% vihyk/khu fu.kZ; iq"V gksus o vihy [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶37

rnuqlkj izLrqr vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA

¶38

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶39

Mittal /7

Union of India through the General Manager v. Smt. Aachudi Alias Aachu Devi W/O Late Shri Kishoremal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India through the General Manager v. Smt. Aachudi Alias Aachu Devi W/O Late Shri Kishoremal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Lila Ram and Ors.

Sona Devi W/O Late Ramesh Chand Meena Vs Kalyan Sahay Meena S/O Jansiram Meena

Manoj Kumar Meena S/O Shri Heera Lal Meena Vs Kalyan Sahay Meena S/O Jansiram Meena

Sahab Singh and Ors. Vs Santosh Kumar

Shekhar Home Developers through Its Managing Partner Shri Rajnesh Aggarwal Vs Amit Kumar Lamba

Vishal Sharma S/O Devraj Sharma Vs Shyamlal @ Radheyshyam S/O Dhanraj