Allowed

Murlidhar v. Bhanwari Devi and Ors.

Rajasthan HC1 Aug 2023CMA/1292/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This thin order disposed of a miscellaneous civil appeal concerning eviction from a house. The court found the appeal and related writ petition maintainable despite delay and allowed the eviction, directing the eviction authorities to act within the terms of the order.

What did the court decide?

The eviction order dated 07-07-2017 was enforced, and eviction authorities were directed to execute the eviction.

Murlidhar Vs Bhanwari Devi and Ors. — Landlord and Tenant | Rajasthan HC (2023)

¶1

[2023:RJ-JD:24391]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1292/2008

¶4

Murlidhar natural guardian of his minor son Budha Ram S/o Shri Murkidhar, B/c Nai, R/o Village Balada, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.

¶5

----Appellant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Bhanwari Devi D/o Shri Ram Chandra @ Chandra Ram, Since Deceased, through her legal representatives :-

¶8

1/1. Heera Ram S/o Shri Chhena Ram

¶9

1/2. Tejaram S/o Shri Heera Ram,

¶10

1/3. Dilip S/o Shri Heera Ram

¶11

1/4. Murli S/o Shri Heera Ram

¶12

1/5. Suman D/o Shri Heera Ram

¶13

All are resident of Village Balada, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.

¶14

Radha Devi D/o Shri Ram Chandra @ Chandra Ram, R/o Village Balada, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.

¶15

Marwar Gramin Bank. Balada at Village Balada, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.

¶16

Head Office, Marwar Gramin Bank, Pali.

¶17

General Public.

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Sanjay Nahar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babulal Bishnoi

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order

¶21

01/08/2023

¶22

;ksX; vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vkns'k 22 fu;e 4 o 9 lifBr /kkjk 151 lhihlh dh rkehy gksus ij ;ksX; vf/koDrk Jh ch-,y- fc'uksbZ }kjk odkyrukek is'k fd;k x;k gS] tks mDr izkFkZuk i= dk tokc is'k djuk ugha pkgrs gSa vkSj izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj djus esa vukifRr izdV dh gSA

¶23

izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 Hkaojh nsoh dh e`R;q fnukad 07-07-2017 dks gqbZ] ftlds 90 fnu ds Hkhrj&Hkhrj vkns'k 22 fu;e 4 o 9 lifBr /kkjk 151 lhihlh dk

[2023:RJ-JD:24391]

[CMA-1292/2008]

(2 of 2)

vkosnu is'k ugha fd;k x;k gS vkSj ;g izkFkZuk i= 08 Qjojh] 2023 dks is'k fd;k x;k gS] tks yxHkx N% o"kZ ds i'pkr~ is'k fd;k x;k gS vkSj bl izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk gh /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶28

vr% /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= esa of.kZr dkj.k rFkk ;ksX; vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ dh vukifRr ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj nsjh dks ekQ fd;k tkdj vkns'k 22 fu;e 4 o 9 lifBr /kkjk 151 lhihlh ds izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vcsVesaV dks vikLr ¼Set-Aside½ fd;k tkrk gSA e`rd ds fof/kd okfjlksa dks fjdkWMZ ij fy;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA la'kksf/kr 'kh"kZd vihy izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk is'k fd;k gqvk gS] ftls fjdkWMZ ij fy;k tkrk gSA

¶29

vihykFkhZ cq/kkjke o vihykFkhZ ds firk eqjyh/kj vkt O;fDr'k% mifLFkr vk, gSa vkSj cq/kkjke dh tUefrfFk ds laca/k esa vk/kkj dkMZ dh izfr is'k dh] ftlds eqrkfcd fnukad 18-06-1995 dh tUefrfFk crkbZ xbZ gSA cq/kkjke }kjk Lo;a dk vc o;Ld gksuk crk;k x;k gSA vihykFkhZ firk eqjyh/kj o iq= cq/kkjke nksuksa bl vihy dks pykuk ugha pkgrs gSa vkSj tfj;s fon~MªkWoy bl vihy dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶30

izR;FkhZ la[;k 02 jk/kk nsoh Hkh bl ekeys esa O;fDr'k% mifLFkr vkbZ gS] ftUgksaus Hkh mDr vihy dks tfj;s fonMªkWoy [kkfjt fd, tkus esa vukifRr izdV dh gSA izR;FkhZ la[;k 1 Hkaojh nsoh ds fof/kd okfjlksa dh vksj ls muds vf/koDrk us Hkh mDr vihy dks tfj;s fonMªkWoy [kkfjt fd, tkus esa vukifRr izdV dh gSA

¶31

vr% bl ekeys esa i{kdkjku~ dh lgefr ds vk/kkj ij vihy vihykFkhZ tfj;s fon~MªkWoy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk i= ;fn yafcr gS rks og Hkh fuLrkfjr le>k tk,A

¶32

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=koyh izkIr gqbZ gS] rks mlds lkFk bl vkns'k dh izfr layXu dj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa Hksth tkosA

¶33

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶34

144-GauravGehlot/-

Murlidhar v. Bhanwari Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murlidhar v. Bhanwari Devi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Najar Mohammad Vs Zahoor Mohd. and Ors.

Salim Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanwal Ram Vs Bhagirath and Ors.

Dungraram Vs Moolaram

Tola Ram and Ors. Vs Ganpat Ram and Ors.

Sharwan Lal Vs Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.