In a civil miscellaneous appeal, the High Court dismissed the suit for lack of prosecution as the appellants were absent. The pending application was also disposed of.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1198/2011
----Appellants
Versus
M/ Arya Construction Company Nimda Gate, Bharatpur.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Keshav Agrawal, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Suresh Goyal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
04/07/2023
None present for the appellants, even in the second round. Appeal is dismissed for wants to prosecution.
The pending application(s) also stands disposed of.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
Keshav/5
State Of Rajatan
State of Rajasthan through Chief Engineer
Executive Engineer
M/ Arya Construction Company
BHUWAN GOYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
