This high court dismissed an appeal challenging an order that granted temporary injunctions to both parties in a partition suit, directing them to maintain status quo and avoid material alterations.
Appeal dismissed; order passed by the learned court below vacated to maintain status quo; stay petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2023:RJ-JD:43162]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 1167/2022
----Appellants
Versus
----Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. |
Narendra Thanvi |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Mahendra Thanvi | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
R.S. Mankad |
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
12/12/2023
[2023:RJ-JD:43162]
[CMA-1167/2022]
(2 of 2)
(REKHA BORANA),J
15-KashishS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order maintaining status quo regarding the disputed property pending partition.
Whether the learned Court below correctly admitted possession of the property by both parties and applied a pragmatic approach.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalita Sharma W/o Late Shri Lalitesh Kumar Sharma
Smt. Sarika Trivedi W/o Shri Manish Trivedi
Naveen Sharma S/o Late Shri Lalitesh Kumar Sharma
Praveen Sharma S/o Late Shri Lalitesh Kumar Sharma
Rekha Borana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
