Kena Ram v. Deo Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Jodhpur allowed Civil First Appeal No. 66/1993 and No. 52/1993 ex parte on grounds that appellants failed to appear representing themselves as unrepresented before the court.
What did the court decide?
Appeals No. 66/1993 and 52/1993 allowed ex parte for non-appearance of appellants' counsel.
What the court decided
[2023:RJ-JD:21574]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 66/1993
Dev Raj S/o Pratapji, R/o Rani, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali.
----Appellant
Versus
Kena Ram S/o Fauji, R/o Binjowa, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 52/1993
Kena Ram S/o Shri Phua Ramji, Aged about 45 years, R/o Binjowa, Tehsil Desuri, District Pali.
----Appellant
Versus
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dev Raj S/o Pratapji
- respondent
Kena Ram S/o Fauji
- appellant
Kena Ram S/o Shri Phua Ramji
- respondent
Deo Raj S/o Shri Pratapji Kumawat
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CFA/52/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court