In an ex-parte civil first appeal relying on Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, the High Court held that the appellants had a right to exhaust remedies against the impugned judgment and disposed of the appeal without deciding merits.
The civil first appeal was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 191/2022
----Appellants
Versus
Girdhari Lal, S/o Ganpat Lal Kumawat, R/o Plot No. 51, Arya Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kapil Bardhar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
06/01/2023
The appellants/defendants have filed this appeal against the judgment and decree dt. 4.2.2017 which was passed ex-parte against them.
Admittedly, the appellants have a right to exhaust remedy under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC against ex-parte judgment and decree dt. 4.2.2017.
In view of the above, the present civil first appeal stands disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Brijesh 22.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prahlad S/o Ganpat Lal Kumawat
Santoshi Devi
Girdhari Lal
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
